1984•Acta Physiologica ScandinavicaRequires access

Active transepithelial potassium transport in frog skin via specific potassium channels in the apical membrane

Ruben Bjerregaard Nielsen

Open publisher page 31 citations

Abstract

In frog skin bathed in Cl--Ringer's solution the short circuit current (SCC) is equal to the net Na+ flux. In the present study Na+ and K+ transport across frog skin have been investigated in skins bathed in a solution where all Cl- has been substituted by the impermeable anion gluconate. In this solution the net Na+ flux (9.22 +/- 0.72 nmole/cm2/min) was significantly higher than the SCC (7.61 +/- 0.63) nmole/cm2/min). Measurement of the transepithelial K+ influx and K+ efflux showed that the discrepancy between the net Na+ flux and the SCC was caused by an active outwards going transepithelial K+ transport. The K+ but not the Na+ transport could be blocked by adding the K+ channel blocking agent Ba++ to the apical solution. Thus, the K+ transport occurs via a K+ specific pathway in the apical membrane. Ouabain blocked both the Na+ and the K+ transport, whereas the presence of the Na+ channel blocking agent amiloride in the apical solution blocked the Na+ transport and reduced the K+ transport. In the presence of amiloride in the apical solution the SCC and the transepithelial potential difference (PD) reversed so that the outside (the apical side) of the frog skin became positive with respect to the basolateral side. The inverted SCC was carried by an active transepithelial K+ transport, this K+ transport required the presence of Na+ in the basolateral solution. The experiments show that frog skin can insert or activate K+ channels in the apical membrane, indicating that the frog may regulate its K+ content by varying the K+ permeability of the apical membrane.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In frog skin bathed in Cl--Ringer's solution the short circuit current (SCC) is equal to the net Na+ flux. In the present study Na+ and K+ transport across frog skin have been investigated in skins bathed in a solution where all Cl- has been substituted by the impermeable anion gluconate. In this solution the net Na+ flux (9.22 +/- 0.72 nmole/cm2/min) was significantly higher than the SCC (7.61 +/- 0.63) nmole/cm2/min). Measurement of the transepithelial K+ influx and K+ efflux showed that the discrepancy between the net Na+ flux and the SCC was caused by an active outwards going transepithelial K+ transport. The K+ but not the Na+ transport could be blocked by adding the K+ channel blocking agent Ba++ to the apical solution. Thus, the K+ transport occurs via a K+ specific pathway in the apical membrane. Ouabain blocked both the Na+ and the K+ transport, whereas the presence of the Na+ channel blocking agent amiloride in the apical solution blocked the Na+ transport and reduced the K+ transport. In the presence of amiloride in the apical solution the SCC and the transepithelial potential difference (PD) reversed so that the outside (the apical side) of the frog skin became positive with respect to the basolateral side. The inverted SCC was carried by an active transepithelial K+ transport, this K+ transport required the presence of Na+ in the basolateral solution. The experiments show that frog skin can insert or activate K+ channels in the apical membrane, indicating that the frog may regulate its K+ content by varying the K+ permeability of the apical membrane.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In frog skin bathed in Cl--Ringer's solution the short circuit current (SCC) is equal to the net Na+ flux. In the present study Na+ and K+ transport across frog skin have been investigated in skins bathed in a solution where all Cl- has been substituted by the impermeable anion gluconate. In this solution the net Na+ flux (9.22 +/- 0.72 nmole/cm2/min) was significantly higher than the SCC (7.61 +/- 0.63) nmole/cm2/min). Measurement of the transepithelial K+ influx and K+ efflux showed that the discrepancy between the net Na+ flux and the SCC was caused by an active outwards going transepithelial K+ transport. The K+ but not the Na+ transport could be blocked by adding the K+ channel blocking agent Ba++ to the apical solution. Thus, the K+ transport occurs via a K+ specific pathway in the apical membrane. Ouabain blocked both the Na+ and the K+ transport, whereas the presence of the Na+ channel blocking agent amiloride in the apical solution blocked the Na+ transport and reduced the K+ transport. In the presence of amiloride in the apical solution the SCC and the transepithelial potential difference (PD) reversed so that the outside (the apical side) of the frog skin became positive with respect to the basolateral side. The inverted SCC was carried by an active transepithelial K+ transport, this K+ transport required the presence of Na+ in the basolateral solution. The experiments show that frog skin can insert or activate K+ channels in the apical membrane, indicating that the frog may regulate its K+ content by varying the K+ permeability of the apical membrane.

Key concepts: Frog Skin, Amiloride, Apical membrane, Chemistry, Biophysics, Ouabain, Potassium, Ion transporter

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Active transepithelial potassium transport in frog skin via specific potassium channels in the apical membrane — Research Paper | ScholarLens