1986•Journal of Social and Clinical PsychologyRequires access

Vicissitudes of Measurement: Depression Tests, a Case in Point

Lawrence C. Perlmuter, Richard A. Monty

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

While it has been widely speculated that the mensuration process may have reactive features, little systematic research has examined its effects on behavior. Empirical findings appear to be in dispute. In studies reported in the present paper, the effects of the measurement of depression on subsequent behaviors were examined in order to help clarify this issue. Specifically, subjects completed a self-report depression inventory prior to performing a chance-determined task. The results showed that the measurement of depression was associated with both improved and degraded performance, depending upon the level of depression measured. These findings appear to support the notion that the refutation (nonendorsement) of depression-related statements alters motivation and performance. The methodological implications of these results are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

While it has been widely speculated that the mensuration process may have reactive features, little systematic research has examined its effects on behavior. Empirical findings appear to be in dispute. In studies reported in the present paper, the effects of the measurement of depression on subsequent behaviors were examined in order to help clarify this issue. Specifically, subjects completed a self-report depression inventory prior to performing a chance-determined task. The results showed that the measurement of depression was associated with both improved and degraded performance, depending upon the level of depression measured. These findings appear to support the notion that the refutation (nonendorsement) of depression-related statements alters motivation and performance. The methodological implications of these results are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

While it has been widely speculated that the mensuration process may have reactive features, little systematic research has examined its effects on behavior. Empirical findings appear to be in dispute. In studies reported in the present paper, the effects of the measurement of depression on subsequent behaviors were examined in order to help clarify this issue. Specifically, subjects completed a self-report depression inventory prior to performing a chance-determined task. The results showed that the measurement of depression was associated with both improved and degraded performance, depending upon the level of depression measured. These findings appear to support the notion that the refutation (nonendorsement) of depression-related statements alters motivation and performance. The methodological implications of these results are discussed.

Key concepts: Psychology, Depression (economics), Task (project management), Point (geometry), Clinical psychology, Developmental psychology, Mathematics, Geometry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Vicissitudes of Measurement: Depression Tests, a Case in Point — Research Paper | ScholarLens