On quadratic Schrödinger equations in R 1+1 : a normal form approach
Seungly Oh, Atanas Stefanov
Abstract
Seungly Oh, Atanas Stefanov
Abstract
For the Schrödinger equation ut + iuxx = 〈▿〉β [u2], β ∈ (0, ½), we establish local well-posedness in Hβ−1+ (note that if β=0, this matches, up to an endpoint, the sharp result of Bejenaru–Tao [Sharp well-posedness and ill-posedness results for a quadratic non-linear Schrödinger equation, J. Funct. Anal. 233 (2006) 228–259.]). Our approach differs significantly from the previous one, we use normal form transformation to analyze the worst interacting terms in the nonlinearity and then show that the remaining terms are (much) smoother. In particular, this allows us to conclude that u−e−it∂x2 u(0) ∈ H−1/2 (R1), even though u(0) ∈ Hβ−1+. In addition, as a byproduct of our normal form analysis, we obtain a Lipschitz continuity property in H−1/2 of the solution operator (which originally acts on Hβ−1+), which is new even in the case β=0. As an easy corollary, we obtain local well-posedness results for ut + iuxx = 〈▿〉βz〈▿〉βz. Finally, we sketch an approach to obtain similar results for the equations ut + iuxx = 〈▿〉β[uū] and ut + iuxx = 〈▿〉β[ū2].
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
For the Schrödinger equation ut + iuxx = 〈▿〉β [u2], β ∈ (0, ½), we establish local well-posedness in Hβ−1+ (note that if β=0, this matches, up to an endpoint, the sharp result of Bejenaru–Tao [Sharp well-posedness and ill-posedness results for a quadratic non-linear Schrödinger equation, J. Funct. Anal. 233 (2006) 228–259.]). Our approach differs significantly from the previous one, we use normal form transformation to analyze the worst interacting terms in the nonlinearity and then show that the remaining terms are (much) smoother. In particular, this allows us to conclude that u−e−it∂x2 u(0) ∈ H−1/2 (R1), even though u(0) ∈ Hβ−1+. In addition, as a byproduct of our normal form analysis, we obtain a Lipschitz continuity property in H−1/2 of the solution operator (which originally acts on Hβ−1+), which is new even in the case β=0. As an easy corollary, we obtain local well-posedness results for ut + iuxx = 〈▿〉βz〈▿〉βz. Finally, we sketch an approach to obtain similar results for the equations ut + iuxx = 〈▿〉β[uū] and ut + iuxx = 〈▿〉β[ū2].
Key concepts: Lipschitz continuity, Corollary, Quadratic equation, Mathematics, Operator (biology), Schrödinger equation, Mathematical physics, Mathematical analysis