2013The Leading EdgeRequires access

Near-surface shear-wave velocities and quality factors derived from high-frequency surface waves

Jianghai Xia, Chao Shen, Yixian Xu

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

Shear (S)-wave velocities of near-surface materials can be derived from inverting the dispersive phase velocity of high-frequency (≥ 2 Hz) surface (Rayleigh and/or Love) waves (e.g., Song et al., 1989). Multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) uses phase information of high-frequency Rayleigh waves recorded on vertical component geophones to determine S-wave velocities (Miller et al., 1999). Multichannel analysis of Love waves (MALW) uses phase information of high-frequency Love waves recorded on horizontal (perpendicular to the direction of wave propagation) component geophones to determine S-wave velocities (Xia, 2012b). Both MASW and MALW possess stable and efficient inversion algorithms to invert phase velocities of surface waves but MALW has some attractive advantages: (1) Love-wave dispersion curves are simpler than those of Rayleigh waves; (2) dispersion images of Love-wave energy have a higher signal-to-noise ratio and are more focused than those generated from Rayleigh waves; and (3) inversion of Love-wave dispersion curves is less dependent on initial models and more stable than from Rayleigh waves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Shear (S)-wave velocities of near-surface materials can be derived from inverting the dispersive phase velocity of high-frequency (≥ 2 Hz) surface (Rayleigh and/or Love) waves (e.g., Song et al., 1989). Multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) uses phase information of high-frequency Rayleigh waves recorded on vertical component geophones to determine S-wave velocities (Miller et al., 1999). Multichannel analysis of Love waves (MALW) uses phase information of high-frequency Love waves recorded on horizontal (perpendicular to the direction of wave propagation) component geophones to determine S-wave velocities (Xia, 2012b). Both MASW and MALW possess stable and efficient inversion algorithms to invert phase velocities of surface waves but MALW has some attractive advantages: (1) Love-wave dispersion curves are simpler than those of Rayleigh waves; (2) dispersion images of Love-wave energy have a higher signal-to-noise ratio and are more focused than those generated from Rayleigh waves; and (3) inversion of Love-wave dispersion curves is less dependent on initial models and more stable than from Rayleigh waves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Shear (S)-wave velocities of near-surface materials can be derived from inverting the dispersive phase velocity of high-frequency (≥ 2 Hz) surface (Rayleigh and/or Love) waves (e.g., Song et al., 1989). Multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) uses phase information of high-frequency Rayleigh waves recorded on vertical component geophones to determine S-wave velocities (Miller et al., 1999). Multichannel analysis of Love waves (MALW) uses phase information of high-frequency Love waves recorded on horizontal (perpendicular to the direction of wave propagation) component geophones to determine S-wave velocities (Xia, 2012b). Both MASW and MALW possess stable and efficient inversion algorithms to invert phase velocities of surface waves but MALW has some attractive advantages: (1) Love-wave dispersion curves are simpler than those of Rayleigh waves; (2) dispersion images of Love-wave energy have a higher signal-to-noise ratio and are more focused than those generated from Rayleigh waves; and (3) inversion of Love-wave dispersion curves is less dependent on initial models and more stable than from Rayleigh waves.

Key concepts: Rayleigh wave, Love wave, Surface wave, Geophone, Mechanical wave, Longitudinal wave, Phase velocity, Dispersion (optics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Near-surface shear-wave velocities and quality factors derived from high-frequency surface waves — Research Paper | ScholarLens