1995•Journal of Structural EngineeringRequires access

Nominal Strength of Composite Prestressed Concrete Bridge Deck Panels

Robert E. Abendroth

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Precast prestressed concrete panels have been used as subdecks in bridge construction. To experimentally investigate the nominal flexural and shear strengths of this composite slab system, five full-scale model composite slab specimens were constructed and tested. One specimen modeled bridge deck condition well within a girder span, and the other four specimens represented geometric conditions that occur with skewed concrete diaphragms at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 40°. The slabs were statically loaded through a wheel footprint at preselected locations until failure occurred. To analytically evaluate the nominal strength for these composite slab specimens, yield-line and punching-shear theories were applied to the crack patterns generated during the ultimate load tests. These computations and the observed mode of failure for the specimens indicated that punching shear governed the nominal strength of the slabs. The nominal strength of the slabs significantly exceeded the design load requirements.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Precast prestressed concrete panels have been used as subdecks in bridge construction. To experimentally investigate the nominal flexural and shear strengths of this composite slab system, five full-scale model composite slab specimens were constructed and tested. One specimen modeled bridge deck condition well within a girder span, and the other four specimens represented geometric conditions that occur with skewed concrete diaphragms at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 40°. The slabs were statically loaded through a wheel footprint at preselected locations until failure occurred. To analytically evaluate the nominal strength for these composite slab specimens, yield-line and punching-shear theories were applied to the crack patterns generated during the ultimate load tests. These computations and the observed mode of failure for the specimens indicated that punching shear governed the nominal strength of the slabs. The nominal strength of the slabs significantly exceeded the design load requirements.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Precast prestressed concrete panels have been used as subdecks in bridge construction. To experimentally investigate the nominal flexural and shear strengths of this composite slab system, five full-scale model composite slab specimens were constructed and tested. One specimen modeled bridge deck condition well within a girder span, and the other four specimens represented geometric conditions that occur with skewed concrete diaphragms at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 40°. The slabs were statically loaded through a wheel footprint at preselected locations until failure occurred. To analytically evaluate the nominal strength for these composite slab specimens, yield-line and punching-shear theories were applied to the crack patterns generated during the ultimate load tests. These computations and the observed mode of failure for the specimens indicated that punching shear governed the nominal strength of the slabs. The nominal strength of the slabs significantly exceeded the design load requirements.

Key concepts: Precast concrete, Structural engineering, Slab, Deck, Composite number, Failure mode and effects analysis, Prestressed concrete, Flexural strength

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nominal Strength of Composite Prestressed Concrete Bridge Deck Panels — Research Paper | ScholarLens