2009Unpublished venueRequires access

Operating modes in actual versus virtual paper-and-pencil design scenarios

Peter Ashley, Clifford Varley

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Conceptual design remains unplugged from other computer-aided design tasks. Engineers and designers continue to favor pencil and paper over computerized sketching tools. It has been suggested that one reason for this is the bewilderingly large range of options available to users of CAD tools. The simplicity of pencil and paper, it was argued, is a virtue, not a drawback. In this paper, we show that, in the hands of a skilled user, a pencil is a complex tool in itself, capable of several different modes of operation. We illustrate this versatility with examples from the field of mechanical engineering. To be competitive, computer-aided sketching tools must support the various operating modes which pencil and paper allows and skilled design engineers habitually use. We discuss to what extent this is already the case, and what further steps can be made towards this goal. Author Keywords Engineering design. Conceptual design. Sketch-based modeling. Input modes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Conceptual design remains unplugged from other computer-aided design tasks. Engineers and designers continue to favor pencil and paper over computerized sketching tools. It has been suggested that one reason for this is the bewilderingly large range of options available to users of CAD tools. The simplicity of pencil and paper, it was argued, is a virtue, not a drawback. In this paper, we show that, in the hands of a skilled user, a pencil is a complex tool in itself, capable of several different modes of operation. We illustrate this versatility with examples from the field of mechanical engineering. To be competitive, computer-aided sketching tools must support the various operating modes which pencil and paper allows and skilled design engineers habitually use. We discuss to what extent this is already the case, and what further steps can be made towards this goal. Author Keywords Engineering design. Conceptual design. Sketch-based modeling. Input modes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Conceptual design remains unplugged from other computer-aided design tasks. Engineers and designers continue to favor pencil and paper over computerized sketching tools. It has been suggested that one reason for this is the bewilderingly large range of options available to users of CAD tools. The simplicity of pencil and paper, it was argued, is a virtue, not a drawback. In this paper, we show that, in the hands of a skilled user, a pencil is a complex tool in itself, capable of several different modes of operation. We illustrate this versatility with examples from the field of mechanical engineering. To be competitive, computer-aided sketching tools must support the various operating modes which pencil and paper allows and skilled design engineers habitually use. We discuss to what extent this is already the case, and what further steps can be made towards this goal. Author Keywords Engineering design. Conceptual design. Sketch-based modeling. Input modes.

Key concepts: Pencil (optics), Sketch, Conceptual design, Computer science, Computer Aided Design, CAD, Simplicity, Human–computer interaction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Operating modes in actual versus virtual paper-and-pencil design scenarios — Research Paper | ScholarLens