2013•Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related SurgeryRequires access

Sensitivity of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Arthrography in Detection of Panlabral Tears of the Glenohumeral Joint

Eric T. Ricchetti, Michael C. Ciccotti, Michael G. Ciccotti, Gerald R. Williams, Mark D. Lazarus

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting combined lesions of the glenoid labrum involving tears of the anterior, posterior, and superior labrum. METHODS: Preoperative MRI findings were available in 46 cases of arthroscopic repair of combined tears of the anterior, posterior, and superior labrum (mean age, 31 years), including 23 noncontrast MRI studies and 24 magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography studies (1 patient had both). MRI findings were compared with the status of the labrum at the time of arthroscopy, and the sensitivity of MRI was determined. RESULTS: MRI showed evidence of combined lesions of the anterior, posterior, and superior labrum in only 10 of 47 studies (21.3%). Only 2 of 23 (8.7%) tears were detected by noncontrast MRI, compared with 8 of 24 (33.3%) by MR arthrography (P = .07). Non-contrast MRI showed evidence of labral pathology in more than one direction in 10 of 23 studies (43.5%), compared with 20 of 24 MR arthrography studies (83.3%) (P = .006). Noncontrast MRI showed no evidence of a labral tear in 3 of 23 patients (13.0%), whereas no MR arthrogram was completely negative for a labral tear (0%) (P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: Combined tears of the anterior, posterior, and superior glenoid labrum are infrequent injuries that are typically not completely defined by either noncontrast MRI or MR arthrography. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting combined lesions of the glenoid labrum involving tears of the anterior, posterior, and superior labrum. METHODS: Preoperative MRI findings were available in 46 cases of arthroscopic repair of combined tears of the anterior, posterior, and superior labrum (mean age, 31 years), including 23 noncontrast MRI studies and 24 magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography studies (1 patient had both). MRI findings were compared with the status of the labrum at the time of arthroscopy, and the sensitivity of MRI was determined. RESULTS: MRI showed evidence of combined lesions of the anterior, posterior, and superior labrum in only 10 of 47 studies (21.3%). Only 2 of 23 (8.7%) tears were detected by noncontrast MRI, compared with 8 of 24 (33.3%) by MR arthrography (P = .07). Non-contrast MRI showed evidence of labral pathology in more than one direction in 10 of 23 studies (43.5%), compared with 20 of 24 MR arthrography studies (83.3%) (P = .006). Noncontrast MRI showed no evidence of a labral tear in 3 of 23 patients (13.0%), whereas no MR arthrogram was completely negative for a labral tear (0%) (P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: Combined tears of the anterior, posterior, and superior glenoid labrum are infrequent injuries that are typically not completely defined by either noncontrast MRI or MR arthrography. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting combined lesions of the glenoid labrum involving tears of the anterior, posterior, and superior labrum. METHODS: Preoperative MRI findings were available in 46 cases of arthroscopic repair of combined tears of the anterior, posterior, and superior labrum (mean age, 31 years), including 23 noncontrast MRI studies and 24 magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography studies (1 patient had both). MRI findings were compared with the status of the labrum at the time of arthroscopy, and the sensitivity of MRI was determined. RESULTS: MRI showed evidence of combined lesions of the anterior, posterior, and superior labrum in only 10 of 47 studies (21.3%). Only 2 of 23 (8.7%) tears were detected by noncontrast MRI, compared with 8 of 24 (33.3%) by MR arthrography (P = .07). Non-contrast MRI showed evidence of labral pathology in more than one direction in 10 of 23 studies (43.5%), compared with 20 of 24 MR arthrography studies (83.3%) (P = .006). Noncontrast MRI showed no evidence of a labral tear in 3 of 23 patients (13.0%), whereas no MR arthrogram was completely negative for a labral tear (0%) (P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: Combined tears of the anterior, posterior, and superior glenoid labrum are infrequent injuries that are typically not completely defined by either noncontrast MRI or MR arthrography. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Key concepts: Magnetic resonance imaging, Medicine, Labrum, Arthrogram, Glenoid labrum, Tears, Arthroscopy, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sensitivity of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Arthrography in Detection of Panlabral Tears of the Glenohumeral Joint — Research Paper | ScholarLens