2009•ChemotherapyRequires access

Cefotaxime Aminoglycoside Interactions

Mark A. Pierce, Ann M. Elliott, G. Cobbs

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Minimum inhibitory concentrations and minimum bactericidal concentrations were determined for cefotaxime, gentamicin, tobramycin and amikacin and for the combination of cefotaxime and each of the aminoglycosides in vitro against 200 strains of Enterobacteriaceae. 91% were susceptible to cefotaxime, 93.5% were susceptible to gentamicin, 89.5% were susceptible to amikacin and 68% were susceptible to tobramycin. There were 95 strains which could be evaluated for synergistic killing by the antimicrobial combinations. Synergism was shown against 78% of strains by cefotaxime and amikacin, against 71% by cefotaxime and tobramycin and against 64% by cefotaxime and gentamicin. In 19 of 22 instances where a bacterial strain was resistant to both cefotaxime and the aminoglycoside, synergistic killing with clinically achievable levels of both antimicrobial agents was demonstrated. There was no significant decrease in concentration of any of the three aminoglycosides after incubation with cefotaxime at 37 degrees C for 0, 4 or 24 h.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Minimum inhibitory concentrations and minimum bactericidal concentrations were determined for cefotaxime, gentamicin, tobramycin and amikacin and for the combination of cefotaxime and each of the aminoglycosides in vitro against 200 strains of Enterobacteriaceae. 91% were susceptible to cefotaxime, 93.5% were susceptible to gentamicin, 89.5% were susceptible to amikacin and 68% were susceptible to tobramycin. There were 95 strains which could be evaluated for synergistic killing by the antimicrobial combinations. Synergism was shown against 78% of strains by cefotaxime and amikacin, against 71% by cefotaxime and tobramycin and against 64% by cefotaxime and gentamicin. In 19 of 22 instances where a bacterial strain was resistant to both cefotaxime and the aminoglycoside, synergistic killing with clinically achievable levels of both antimicrobial agents was demonstrated. There was no significant decrease in concentration of any of the three aminoglycosides after incubation with cefotaxime at 37 degrees C for 0, 4 or 24 h.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Minimum inhibitory concentrations and minimum bactericidal concentrations were determined for cefotaxime, gentamicin, tobramycin and amikacin and for the combination of cefotaxime and each of the aminoglycosides in vitro against 200 strains of Enterobacteriaceae. 91% were susceptible to cefotaxime, 93.5% were susceptible to gentamicin, 89.5% were susceptible to amikacin and 68% were susceptible to tobramycin. There were 95 strains which could be evaluated for synergistic killing by the antimicrobial combinations. Synergism was shown against 78% of strains by cefotaxime and amikacin, against 71% by cefotaxime and tobramycin and against 64% by cefotaxime and gentamicin. In 19 of 22 instances where a bacterial strain was resistant to both cefotaxime and the aminoglycoside, synergistic killing with clinically achievable levels of both antimicrobial agents was demonstrated. There was no significant decrease in concentration of any of the three aminoglycosides after incubation with cefotaxime at 37 degrees C for 0, 4 or 24 h.

Key concepts: Cefotaxime, Amikacin, Tobramycin, Aminoglycoside, Gentamicin, Microbiology, Antimicrobial, Antibiotics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cefotaxime Aminoglycoside Interactions — Research Paper | ScholarLens