1982The Japanese Journal of PharmacologyOpen access

Effects of local anesthetics on monoamine oxidase, and their membrane effects.

Hajime Yasuhara, Ikuho Wada, Koji Sakamoto, Kazuya Kamijo

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

The effects of various local anesthetics on rat brain and liver monoamine oxidase (MAO) and their antihemolytic and local anesthetic effects were studied. All local anesthetics tested at 1 x 10(-7) M to 1 x 10(-3) M inhibited MAO activity in rat liver mitochondria with 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) as substrate. The order of potency was tetracaine>procaine>dibucaine>lidocaine>prilocaine. Tetracaine and procaine inhibited 5-HT oxidation much more than beta-phenylethylamine (PEA) oxidation. Dibucaine inhibited PEA oxidation as much as 5-HT oxidation. Inhibition of MAO by local anesthetics other than dibucaine was reversible. Tetracaine and procaine inhibited 5-HT oxidation competitively, whereas dibucaine inhibited it non-competitively. Antihemolytic effects were observed with dibucaine and tetracaine at concentrations of 6 x 10(-5) M and 1 x 10(-4), respectively. The order of surface anesthetic potencies was dibucaine>tetracaine>prilocaine>lidocaine>procaine. These results suggest that the inhibition of MAO activities by local anesthetics depends on both electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions between these drugs and enzyme-associated phospholipids or the hydrophobic regions of proteins.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The effects of various local anesthetics on rat brain and liver monoamine oxidase (MAO) and their antihemolytic and local anesthetic effects were studied. All local anesthetics tested at 1 x 10(-7) M to 1 x 10(-3) M inhibited MAO activity in rat liver mitochondria with 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) as substrate. The order of potency was tetracaine>procaine>dibucaine>lidocaine>prilocaine. Tetracaine and procaine inhibited 5-HT oxidation much more than beta-phenylethylamine (PEA) oxidation. Dibucaine inhibited PEA oxidation as much as 5-HT oxidation. Inhibition of MAO by local anesthetics other than dibucaine was reversible. Tetracaine and procaine inhibited 5-HT oxidation competitively, whereas dibucaine inhibited it non-competitively. Antihemolytic effects were observed with dibucaine and tetracaine at concentrations of 6 x 10(-5) M and 1 x 10(-4), respectively. The order of surface anesthetic potencies was dibucaine>tetracaine>prilocaine>lidocaine>procaine. These results suggest that the inhibition of MAO activities by local anesthetics depends on both electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions between these drugs and enzyme-associated phospholipids or the hydrophobic regions of proteins.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The effects of various local anesthetics on rat brain and liver monoamine oxidase (MAO) and their antihemolytic and local anesthetic effects were studied. All local anesthetics tested at 1 x 10(-7) M to 1 x 10(-3) M inhibited MAO activity in rat liver mitochondria with 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) as substrate. The order of potency was tetracaine>procaine>dibucaine>lidocaine>prilocaine. Tetracaine and procaine inhibited 5-HT oxidation much more than beta-phenylethylamine (PEA) oxidation. Dibucaine inhibited PEA oxidation as much as 5-HT oxidation. Inhibition of MAO by local anesthetics other than dibucaine was reversible. Tetracaine and procaine inhibited 5-HT oxidation competitively, whereas dibucaine inhibited it non-competitively. Antihemolytic effects were observed with dibucaine and tetracaine at concentrations of 6 x 10(-5) M and 1 x 10(-4), respectively. The order of surface anesthetic potencies was dibucaine>tetracaine>prilocaine>lidocaine>procaine. These results suggest that the inhibition of MAO activities by local anesthetics depends on both electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions between these drugs and enzyme-associated phospholipids or the hydrophobic regions of proteins.

Key concepts: Dibucaine, Tetracaine, Procaine, Chemistry, Monoamine oxidase, Pharmacology, Prilocaine, Local anesthetic

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of local anesthetics on monoamine oxidase, and their membrane effects. — Research Paper | ScholarLens