Is Percutaneous Monotherapy for Staghorn Calculus Still Indicated in the Era of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy?
Nelson Rodrígues Netto, Joaquim Francisco de Almeida Claro, Ubirajara Ferreira
Abstract
Nelson Rodrígues Netto, Joaquim Francisco de Almeida Claro, Ubirajara Ferreira
Abstract
Staghorn stones can be treated by percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL); however, the combination of the two techniques appears as the most frequent treatment. In a previous study, the investigators noted that staghorn calculi treated with PCNL monotherapy have a good clearance rate. Herein, we have reviewed 102 staghorn stones that underwent PCNL before (1984-1986) (Group 1; n = 51) and after (1987-1990) (Group 2; n = 45) the introduction of SWL. The stone burden has increased in both size and complexity: there were 27 complete staghorn calculi (60%) in Group 2 compared with 19 (37%) in Group 1. Despite the higher number of kidney punctures, blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine measurements demonstrated improvement of renal function postoperatively. The stone-free rates were 78% and 89% and the retreatment rates 31% and 18% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Complications (29% and 38%) were a function of the technical factors that become more apparent in the more difficult cases. Our data support the concept that the surgeon should have no previous intention to use the lithotripter and, therefore, should try to remove the entire stone percutaneously safely and economically.
OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Staghorn stones can be treated by percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL); however, the combination of the two techniques appears as the most frequent treatment. In a previous study, the investigators noted that staghorn calculi treated with PCNL monotherapy have a good clearance rate. Herein, we have reviewed 102 staghorn stones that underwent PCNL before (1984-1986) (Group 1; n = 51) and after (1987-1990) (Group 2; n = 45) the introduction of SWL. The stone burden has increased in both size and complexity: there were 27 complete staghorn calculi (60%) in Group 2 compared with 19 (37%) in Group 1. Despite the higher number of kidney punctures, blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine measurements demonstrated improvement of renal function postoperatively. The stone-free rates were 78% and 89% and the retreatment rates 31% and 18% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Complications (29% and 38%) were a function of the technical factors that become more apparent in the more difficult cases. Our data support the concept that the surgeon should have no previous intention to use the lithotripter and, therefore, should try to remove the entire stone percutaneously safely and economically.
Key concepts: Medicine, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Staghorn calculus, Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, Surgery, Creatinine, Renal function, Percutaneous