1997•Quarterly Journal of SpeechRequires access

A reexamination of Edmund Burke's rhetorical art: A rhetorical struggle between prudence and heroism

David G. Levasseur

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Scholars have recognized sharp inconsistencies in Burke's rhetorical abilities. To explain these inconsistencies, this essay explores two distinct conceptions of rhetoric as an instrument of prudential reason and as an existential means of constituting oneself. These two uses of rhetoric, as Burke's writings reveal, commonly take discourse in contradictory directions. In Burke's case, this struggle between rhetorical prudence and rhetorical heroism generated discourse which was at war with itself. In order to further this claim, this essay generally focuses on a largely unexplored body of Burke's rhetoric, his private correspondence.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Scholars have recognized sharp inconsistencies in Burke's rhetorical abilities. To explain these inconsistencies, this essay explores two distinct conceptions of rhetoric as an instrument of prudential reason and as an existential means of constituting oneself. These two uses of rhetoric, as Burke's writings reveal, commonly take discourse in contradictory directions. In Burke's case, this struggle between rhetorical prudence and rhetorical heroism generated discourse which was at war with itself. In order to further this claim, this essay generally focuses on a largely unexplored body of Burke's rhetoric, his private correspondence.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Scholars have recognized sharp inconsistencies in Burke's rhetorical abilities. To explain these inconsistencies, this essay explores two distinct conceptions of rhetoric as an instrument of prudential reason and as an existential means of constituting oneself. These two uses of rhetoric, as Burke's writings reveal, commonly take discourse in contradictory directions. In Burke's case, this struggle between rhetorical prudence and rhetorical heroism generated discourse which was at war with itself. In order to further this claim, this essay generally focuses on a largely unexplored body of Burke's rhetoric, his private correspondence.

Key concepts: Rhetorical question, Rhetoric, Prudence, Rhetorical modes, Existentialism, Rhetorical criticism, Sociology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A reexamination of Edmund Burke's rhetorical art: A rhetorical struggle between prudence and heroism — Research Paper | ScholarLens