2005The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Voice onset time (VOT) in Canadian French and English: Monolingual and bilingual adults

Andrea A. N. MacLeod, Carol Stoel‐Gammon

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This study focused on the contrasts produced by early bilingual speakers (n=6) across their two languages in comparison with monolingual speakers (Canadian English (CE), n=5; Canadian French (CF), n=6). VOT production was measured in monosyllabic CE and CF words that began with one of four stop consonants, /p, b, t, d/ followed by one of three vowels. A total of 14–18 words for each of the four stop consonants for each language was elicited with a total number 1700 acoustically analyzed productions. The participants were tested individually in quiet rooms using a single target language throughout the session. As expected, the monolingual speakers produced a two-way contrast (statistically significant: p<0.05): for CE speakers, short-lag VOT versus long-lag VOT; for CF speakers, lead VOT versus short-lag VOT. Rather than producing a two-way contrast (e.g., lead VOT versus lag VOT) or a three-way contrast (e.g., lead VOT versus short-lag VOT versus long-lag VOT), the bilingual speakers produced a four-way contrast (statistically significant: p<0.05): long lead VOT (CF /b, d/), short lead VOT (CE /b, d/), short-lag VOT (CF /p, t/) and long-lag VOT (CE /p,t/). These results suggest that bilinguals are maintaining phonetic contrasts both within and across their two languages.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study focused on the contrasts produced by early bilingual speakers (n=6) across their two languages in comparison with monolingual speakers (Canadian English (CE), n=5; Canadian French (CF), n=6). VOT production was measured in monosyllabic CE and CF words that began with one of four stop consonants, /p, b, t, d/ followed by one of three vowels. A total of 14–18 words for each of the four stop consonants for each language was elicited with a total number 1700 acoustically analyzed productions. The participants were tested individually in quiet rooms using a single target language throughout the session. As expected, the monolingual speakers produced a two-way contrast (statistically significant: p<0.05): for CE speakers, short-lag VOT versus long-lag VOT; for CF speakers, lead VOT versus short-lag VOT. Rather than producing a two-way contrast (e.g., lead VOT versus lag VOT) or a three-way contrast (e.g., lead VOT versus short-lag VOT versus long-lag VOT), the bilingual speakers produced a four-way contrast (statistically significant: p<0.05): long lead VOT (CF /b, d/), short lead VOT (CE /b, d/), short-lag VOT (CF /p, t/) and long-lag VOT (CE /p,t/). These results suggest that bilinguals are maintaining phonetic contrasts both within and across their two languages.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study focused on the contrasts produced by early bilingual speakers (n=6) across their two languages in comparison with monolingual speakers (Canadian English (CE), n=5; Canadian French (CF), n=6). VOT production was measured in monosyllabic CE and CF words that began with one of four stop consonants, /p, b, t, d/ followed by one of three vowels. A total of 14–18 words for each of the four stop consonants for each language was elicited with a total number 1700 acoustically analyzed productions. The participants were tested individually in quiet rooms using a single target language throughout the session. As expected, the monolingual speakers produced a two-way contrast (statistically significant: p<0.05): for CE speakers, short-lag VOT versus long-lag VOT; for CF speakers, lead VOT versus short-lag VOT. Rather than producing a two-way contrast (e.g., lead VOT versus lag VOT) or a three-way contrast (e.g., lead VOT versus short-lag VOT versus long-lag VOT), the bilingual speakers produced a four-way contrast (statistically significant: p<0.05): long lead VOT (CF /b, d/), short lead VOT (CE /b, d/), short-lag VOT (CF /p, t/) and long-lag VOT (CE /p,t/). These results suggest that bilinguals are maintaining phonetic contrasts both within and across their two languages.

Key concepts: Voice-onset time, Audiology, Contrast (vision), Lag, Psychology, Linguistics, Mathematics, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Voice onset time (VOT) in Canadian French and English: Monolingual and bilingual adults — Research Paper | ScholarLens