1994African Journal of Range and Forage ScienceRequires access

Valuing preferences for wetland preservation: A Wakkerstroom case study

R. G. Oellermann, M AG Darroch, J.R. Klug

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Wetland loss rates remain high as the full value of wetland services is understated. This is partly due to the benefits of wetland preservation (non‐use) being unpriced, as they are not traded in markets. These benefits are reflected by option, existence and bequest demands for wetland preservation. The contingent valuation method (CVM) was used to estimate the value of non‐market wetland preservation benefits, by asking members of the Wakkerstroom Natural Heritage Association (WNHA) to, state their willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) to preserve the Wakkerstroom wetland. For option value, the median WTP class ranged from R17.51 to R20.00 per month, whilst existence and bequest values had the same median WTP class which ranged from R15.01 to R.17.50 per month. Well‐designed CVM studies can help to make the public, policy‐makers and individual farmers more aware of the benefits of wetland preservation, leading to more informed decisions being made about wetland use.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Wetland loss rates remain high as the full value of wetland services is understated. This is partly due to the benefits of wetland preservation (non‐use) being unpriced, as they are not traded in markets. These benefits are reflected by option, existence and bequest demands for wetland preservation. The contingent valuation method (CVM) was used to estimate the value of non‐market wetland preservation benefits, by asking members of the Wakkerstroom Natural Heritage Association (WNHA) to, state their willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) to preserve the Wakkerstroom wetland. For option value, the median WTP class ranged from R17.51 to R20.00 per month, whilst existence and bequest values had the same median WTP class which ranged from R15.01 to R.17.50 per month. Well‐designed CVM studies can help to make the public, policy‐makers and individual farmers more aware of the benefits of wetland preservation, leading to more informed decisions being made about wetland use.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Wetland loss rates remain high as the full value of wetland services is understated. This is partly due to the benefits of wetland preservation (non‐use) being unpriced, as they are not traded in markets. These benefits are reflected by option, existence and bequest demands for wetland preservation. The contingent valuation method (CVM) was used to estimate the value of non‐market wetland preservation benefits, by asking members of the Wakkerstroom Natural Heritage Association (WNHA) to, state their willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) to preserve the Wakkerstroom wetland. For option value, the median WTP class ranged from R17.51 to R20.00 per month, whilst existence and bequest values had the same median WTP class which ranged from R15.01 to R.17.50 per month. Well‐designed CVM studies can help to make the public, policy‐makers and individual farmers more aware of the benefits of wetland preservation, leading to more informed decisions being made about wetland use.

Key concepts: Wetland, Bequest, Contingent valuation, Willingness to pay, Valuation (finance), Value (mathematics), Natural resource economics, Market value

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Valuing preferences for wetland preservation: A Wakkerstroom case study — Research Paper | ScholarLens