2004•OtolaryngologyRequires access

Use of Ultrasound in the Differential Diagnosis of Peritonsillar Infections

Bernardo Cunha Araújo Filho, Luis Ubirajara Sennes, Flávio Akira Sakae, Marcos Roberto de Menezes

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of ultrasound as a noninvasive and inexpensive method of diagnosis, differentiating peritonsillar abscess from peritonsillar cellulitis. Methods: Thirty-nine patients with a clinical diagnosis of peritonsillar infection, 24 females and 15 males (age range, 7 to 44 years), were evaluated in the Clinical Hospital of Sao Paulo University Medical School, in the Otolaryngology Emergency Service. These patients were evaluated with intraoral and percutaneous ultrasound. Needle aspiration was used to compare and confirm the diagnosis. Results: The ultrasound showed 69.3% of the patients with peritonsillar abscess and 30.7% with peritonsillar cellulitis. The sensitivity was 96% and the specificity was 78.5%. Conclusion: The authors conclude that ultrasonography performed by a experienced radiologist proved to be a efficient method in the differential diagnosis of peritonsillar abscess and peritonsillar cellulitis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of ultrasound as a noninvasive and inexpensive method of diagnosis, differentiating peritonsillar abscess from peritonsillar cellulitis. Methods: Thirty-nine patients with a clinical diagnosis of peritonsillar infection, 24 females and 15 males (age range, 7 to 44 years), were evaluated in the Clinical Hospital of Sao Paulo University Medical School, in the Otolaryngology Emergency Service. These patients were evaluated with intraoral and percutaneous ultrasound. Needle aspiration was used to compare and confirm the diagnosis. Results: The ultrasound showed 69.3% of the patients with peritonsillar abscess and 30.7% with peritonsillar cellulitis. The sensitivity was 96% and the specificity was 78.5%. Conclusion: The authors conclude that ultrasonography performed by a experienced radiologist proved to be a efficient method in the differential diagnosis of peritonsillar abscess and peritonsillar cellulitis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of ultrasound as a noninvasive and inexpensive method of diagnosis, differentiating peritonsillar abscess from peritonsillar cellulitis. Methods: Thirty-nine patients with a clinical diagnosis of peritonsillar infection, 24 females and 15 males (age range, 7 to 44 years), were evaluated in the Clinical Hospital of Sao Paulo University Medical School, in the Otolaryngology Emergency Service. These patients were evaluated with intraoral and percutaneous ultrasound. Needle aspiration was used to compare and confirm the diagnosis. Results: The ultrasound showed 69.3% of the patients with peritonsillar abscess and 30.7% with peritonsillar cellulitis. The sensitivity was 96% and the specificity was 78.5%. Conclusion: The authors conclude that ultrasonography performed by a experienced radiologist proved to be a efficient method in the differential diagnosis of peritonsillar abscess and peritonsillar cellulitis.

Key concepts: Peritonsillar Abscess, Differential diagnosis, Medicine, Ultrasound, Radiology, Pathology, Tonsillectomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Use of Ultrasound in the Differential Diagnosis of Peritonsillar Infections — Research Paper | ScholarLens