1975The Journal of Comparative NeurologyRequires access

On the “selectivity” of the Golgi‐Cox method

Joseph F. Pasternak, Thomas A. Woolsey

Open publisher page 86 citations

Abstract

The randomness of the impregnation of layer IV cortical neurons by the Golgi-Cox method (Van der Loos, '56) has been assessed directly in Barrel C-1 of the mouse SmI. All Golgi-Cox impregnated neurons and unimpregnated neurons which were revealed with a Nissl counterstain were counted and measured in ten cerebral hemispheres cut tangential to the pia overlying the barrel field. The percentage of Golgi stained neurons varied considerably in different preparations from 0.73% to 2.26% with an average of 1.29%. The size distributions of both the Golgi impregnated and Nissl stained cells are similar but the difference of the means is statistically significant. However, if the means are equated there is no statistical difference in the two populations. When the Golgi precipitate is removed and the cells re-measured following Nissl staining there is a systematic reduction of the perikaryal cross-sectional area which is compatible with the differences in the means observed for the two populations as a whole. Finally, the frequency with which Golgi impregnated neurons are found in the barrel sides and hollows parallels the frequency with which Nissl stained neurons are observed in these two locations. We conclude that this variant of the Golgi method impregnates barrel neurons randomly. The value of this information for quantitative studies of cerebral cortex is discussed as is the potential of the system for elucidating some of the mechanisms responsible for Golgi impregnation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The randomness of the impregnation of layer IV cortical neurons by the Golgi-Cox method (Van der Loos, '56) has been assessed directly in Barrel C-1 of the mouse SmI. All Golgi-Cox impregnated neurons and unimpregnated neurons which were revealed with a Nissl counterstain were counted and measured in ten cerebral hemispheres cut tangential to the pia overlying the barrel field. The percentage of Golgi stained neurons varied considerably in different preparations from 0.73% to 2.26% with an average of 1.29%. The size distributions of both the Golgi impregnated and Nissl stained cells are similar but the difference of the means is statistically significant. However, if the means are equated there is no statistical difference in the two populations. When the Golgi precipitate is removed and the cells re-measured following Nissl staining there is a systematic reduction of the perikaryal cross-sectional area which is compatible with the differences in the means observed for the two populations as a whole. Finally, the frequency with which Golgi impregnated neurons are found in the barrel sides and hollows parallels the frequency with which Nissl stained neurons are observed in these two locations. We conclude that this variant of the Golgi method impregnates barrel neurons randomly. The value of this information for quantitative studies of cerebral cortex is discussed as is the potential of the system for elucidating some of the mechanisms responsible for Golgi impregnation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 86 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The randomness of the impregnation of layer IV cortical neurons by the Golgi-Cox method (Van der Loos, '56) has been assessed directly in Barrel C-1 of the mouse SmI. All Golgi-Cox impregnated neurons and unimpregnated neurons which were revealed with a Nissl counterstain were counted and measured in ten cerebral hemispheres cut tangential to the pia overlying the barrel field. The percentage of Golgi stained neurons varied considerably in different preparations from 0.73% to 2.26% with an average of 1.29%. The size distributions of both the Golgi impregnated and Nissl stained cells are similar but the difference of the means is statistically significant. However, if the means are equated there is no statistical difference in the two populations. When the Golgi precipitate is removed and the cells re-measured following Nissl staining there is a systematic reduction of the perikaryal cross-sectional area which is compatible with the differences in the means observed for the two populations as a whole. Finally, the frequency with which Golgi impregnated neurons are found in the barrel sides and hollows parallels the frequency with which Nissl stained neurons are observed in these two locations. We conclude that this variant of the Golgi method impregnates barrel neurons randomly. The value of this information for quantitative studies of cerebral cortex is discussed as is the potential of the system for elucidating some of the mechanisms responsible for Golgi impregnation.

Key concepts: Nissl body, Golgi apparatus, Biology, Staining, Anatomy, Cell biology, Biophysics, Endoplasmic reticulum

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the “selectivity” of the Golgi‐Cox method — Research Paper | ScholarLens