Mean reversion in stock prices: new evidence from panel unit root tests
Paresh Kumar Narayan, Seema Narayan
Abstract
Paresh Kumar Narayan, Seema Narayan
Abstract
Purpose There are several studies that investigate evidence for mean reversion in stock prices. However, there is no consensus as to whether stock prices are mean reverting or random walk (unit root) processes. The goal of this paper is to re‐examine mean reversion in stock prices. Design/methodology/approach The authors use five different panel unit root tests, namely the Im, Pesaran and Shin t‐bar test statistic, the Levin and Lin test, the Im, Lee, and Tieslau Lagrangian multiplier test statistic, the seemingly unrelated regression test, and the multivariate augmented Dickey Fuller test advocated by Taylor and Sarno. Findings The main finding is that there is no mean reversion of stock prices, consistent with the efficient market hypothesis. Research limitations/implications One issue not considered by this study is the role of structural breaks. It may be the case that the efficient market hypothesis is contingent on structural breaks in stock prices. Future studies should model structural breaks. Practical implications The findings have implications for econometric modelling, in particular forecasting. Originality/value This paper adds to the scarce literature on the mean reverting property of stock prices based on panel data; thus, it should be useful for researchers.
OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Purpose There are several studies that investigate evidence for mean reversion in stock prices. However, there is no consensus as to whether stock prices are mean reverting or random walk (unit root) processes. The goal of this paper is to re‐examine mean reversion in stock prices. Design/methodology/approach The authors use five different panel unit root tests, namely the Im, Pesaran and Shin t‐bar test statistic, the Levin and Lin test, the Im, Lee, and Tieslau Lagrangian multiplier test statistic, the seemingly unrelated regression test, and the multivariate augmented Dickey Fuller test advocated by Taylor and Sarno. Findings The main finding is that there is no mean reversion of stock prices, consistent with the efficient market hypothesis. Research limitations/implications One issue not considered by this study is the role of structural breaks. It may be the case that the efficient market hypothesis is contingent on structural breaks in stock prices. Future studies should model structural breaks. Practical implications The findings have implications for econometric modelling, in particular forecasting. Originality/value This paper adds to the scarce literature on the mean reverting property of stock prices based on panel data; thus, it should be useful for researchers.
Key concepts: Mean reversion, Econometrics, Economics, Unit root, Stock (firearms), Unit root test, Stock market, Statistic