2002Unpublished venueRequires access

The Rational Analysis of Human Cognition*

Nick Chater, Mike Oaks ford

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Rationality appears basic to the understanding of mind and behaviour. In practical decisions, such as whether a person is morally responsible for his or her actions, to whether a person can be hospitalized without consent, it seems crucial to be able to draw a boundary between sanity and madness, between rationality and irrationality. In economics, and increasingly, other areas of social science, human behaviour is explained as the outcome of ‘rational choice’, concerning which products to buy, whom to marry, or how many children to have (Becker 1975, 1981; Elster 1986). But rationality assumptions go deeper still—they are embodied in the folk psychological style of explanation in which we describe each other’s minds and behaviour (Fodor 1987; Stich 1983).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Rationality appears basic to the understanding of mind and behaviour. In practical decisions, such as whether a person is morally responsible for his or her actions, to whether a person can be hospitalized without consent, it seems crucial to be able to draw a boundary between sanity and madness, between rationality and irrationality. In economics, and increasingly, other areas of social science, human behaviour is explained as the outcome of ‘rational choice’, concerning which products to buy, whom to marry, or how many children to have (Becker 1975, 1981; Elster 1986). But rationality assumptions go deeper still—they are embodied in the folk psychological style of explanation in which we describe each other’s minds and behaviour (Fodor 1987; Stich 1983).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Rationality appears basic to the understanding of mind and behaviour. In practical decisions, such as whether a person is morally responsible for his or her actions, to whether a person can be hospitalized without consent, it seems crucial to be able to draw a boundary between sanity and madness, between rationality and irrationality. In economics, and increasingly, other areas of social science, human behaviour is explained as the outcome of ‘rational choice’, concerning which products to buy, whom to marry, or how many children to have (Becker 1975, 1981; Elster 1986). But rationality assumptions go deeper still—they are embodied in the folk psychological style of explanation in which we describe each other’s minds and behaviour (Fodor 1987; Stich 1983).

Key concepts: Rationality, Irrationality, Psychology, Cognition, Embodied cognition, Sanity, Epistemology, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Rational Analysis of Human Cognition* — Research Paper | ScholarLens