1999Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology ArthroscopyRequires access

The role of magnetic resonance imaging in routine decision making for meniscal surgery

Thomas Muellner, A. Nikolić, Harald Kubiena, Franz Kainberger, Martina Mittlboeck, V. Vécsei

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

This clinical study evaluated factors affecting the decision for meniscal surgery in a patient population seen routinely at a trauma clinic. The study hypothesis was that patients who sustain a traumatic injury to the knee or have a long history of clinical symptoms are likelier to be operated on. We investigated 149 patients clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Group A (n = 62) underwent arthroscopic surgery and group B (n = 87) were treated conservatively. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine correlations with regard to age, gender, injury pattern, period between the injury and first clinical examination, and MRI results. We found no significant difference between the two groups with regard to gender (P = 0.1), injury pattern (P = 0.44), or period between injury and first clinical examination (P = 0.5). Patients in group A were significantly older than those in group B (P = 0.044), and, as expected, MRI signal alterations were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P = 0.001). In acutely injured patients MRI helps to establish an accurate diagnosis, and in cases of positive MRI findings in a symptomatic patient, the surgeon should not wait 4-6 weeks but should immediately recommend surgery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This clinical study evaluated factors affecting the decision for meniscal surgery in a patient population seen routinely at a trauma clinic. The study hypothesis was that patients who sustain a traumatic injury to the knee or have a long history of clinical symptoms are likelier to be operated on. We investigated 149 patients clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Group A (n = 62) underwent arthroscopic surgery and group B (n = 87) were treated conservatively. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine correlations with regard to age, gender, injury pattern, period between the injury and first clinical examination, and MRI results. We found no significant difference between the two groups with regard to gender (P = 0.1), injury pattern (P = 0.44), or period between injury and first clinical examination (P = 0.5). Patients in group A were significantly older than those in group B (P = 0.044), and, as expected, MRI signal alterations were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P = 0.001). In acutely injured patients MRI helps to establish an accurate diagnosis, and in cases of positive MRI findings in a symptomatic patient, the surgeon should not wait 4-6 weeks but should immediately recommend surgery.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This clinical study evaluated factors affecting the decision for meniscal surgery in a patient population seen routinely at a trauma clinic. The study hypothesis was that patients who sustain a traumatic injury to the knee or have a long history of clinical symptoms are likelier to be operated on. We investigated 149 patients clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Group A (n = 62) underwent arthroscopic surgery and group B (n = 87) were treated conservatively. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine correlations with regard to age, gender, injury pattern, period between the injury and first clinical examination, and MRI results. We found no significant difference between the two groups with regard to gender (P = 0.1), injury pattern (P = 0.44), or period between injury and first clinical examination (P = 0.5). Patients in group A were significantly older than those in group B (P = 0.044), and, as expected, MRI signal alterations were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P = 0.001). In acutely injured patients MRI helps to establish an accurate diagnosis, and in cases of positive MRI findings in a symptomatic patient, the surgeon should not wait 4-6 weeks but should immediately recommend surgery.

Key concepts: Medicine, Magnetic resonance imaging, Logistic regression, Surgery, Physical examination, Population, Radiology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The role of magnetic resonance imaging in routine decision making for meniscal surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens