2007Journal of Industrial RelationsRequires access

Corporatism as a Process of Working-class Containment and Roll-back: The Recent Experiences of South Africa and South Korea

Tom Bramble, Neal Ollett

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

In this article we argue that recent debates in the corporatist literature about whether corporatism is best understood as a process of structured interest representation or political dialogue miss the point as to corporatism's central task — the shift of material resources and power away from the working class to the capitalist class, in which two processes are evident — containment and roll-back. We discuss these processes in the context of successive waves of corporatism in Western Europe from the 1940s to the 1990s before moving on to an analysis of the contrasting fortunes of corporatism in South Africa and South Korea during democratic transition. We conclude that the ability of corporatism to carry out the processes of containment and roll back in these two cases have been dependent on the existence (or absence) of supportive prior political relationships between organized labour and the state.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this article we argue that recent debates in the corporatist literature about whether corporatism is best understood as a process of structured interest representation or political dialogue miss the point as to corporatism's central task — the shift of material resources and power away from the working class to the capitalist class, in which two processes are evident — containment and roll-back. We discuss these processes in the context of successive waves of corporatism in Western Europe from the 1940s to the 1990s before moving on to an analysis of the contrasting fortunes of corporatism in South Africa and South Korea during democratic transition. We conclude that the ability of corporatism to carry out the processes of containment and roll back in these two cases have been dependent on the existence (or absence) of supportive prior political relationships between organized labour and the state.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this article we argue that recent debates in the corporatist literature about whether corporatism is best understood as a process of structured interest representation or political dialogue miss the point as to corporatism's central task — the shift of material resources and power away from the working class to the capitalist class, in which two processes are evident — containment and roll-back. We discuss these processes in the context of successive waves of corporatism in Western Europe from the 1940s to the 1990s before moving on to an analysis of the contrasting fortunes of corporatism in South Africa and South Korea during democratic transition. We conclude that the ability of corporatism to carry out the processes of containment and roll back in these two cases have been dependent on the existence (or absence) of supportive prior political relationships between organized labour and the state.

Key concepts: Corporatism, Context (archaeology), Political science, Politics, Political economy, Representation (politics), Democracy, State (computer science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Corporatism as a Process of Working-class Containment and Roll-back: The Recent Experiences of South Africa and South Korea — Research Paper | ScholarLens