Social Desirability and “Acquiescence Response Set”
Donald R. Miklich
Abstract
Donald R. Miklich
Abstract
This study showed that the frequently found negative correlation between social desirability (SD) and the so-called “acquiescence response set” (ARS) is not an artifact of contaminated scales as its presence in two unconcaminated instruments was demonstrated. A theoretically consistent explanation of this relationship based on a reinterpretation of the ARS variable is suggested.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This study showed that the frequently found negative correlation between social desirability (SD) and the so-called “acquiescence response set” (ARS) is not an artifact of contaminated scales as its presence in two unconcaminated instruments was demonstrated. A theoretically consistent explanation of this relationship based on a reinterpretation of the ARS variable is suggested.
Key concepts: Acquiescence, Social desirability, Reinterpretation, Psychology, Set (abstract data type), Social psychology, Response bias, Artifact (error)