Law and the Human Body: Property Rights, Ownership and Control
Susan Gibbons
Abstract
Susan Gibbons
Abstract
Around the globe, biomedical research is booming. Rapid scientific and technological advances—particularly in the genetics, genomics, biobanking and computing fields—have substantially increased our prospects of uncovering the root causes of a wide range of common complex human diseases and disorders. These developments may well lead to many new diagnostic and therapeutic products emerging over the coming years. The potential commercial payoffs are enormous. Crucial to all of this is the ability to obtain, store and use human biological materials—materials which, as Hardcastle observes in this often excellent and highly readable book on the English law1 surrounding human bodies and separated biological materials, many now regard as ‘valuable commodities’ in their own right.2 Yet, these developments raise a thorny and hotly debated question, one posed and tackled in this book: what rights, if any, donors of biological samples (termed ‘sources’ by Hardcastle) should be accorded under the law, so...
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Around the globe, biomedical research is booming. Rapid scientific and technological advances—particularly in the genetics, genomics, biobanking and computing fields—have substantially increased our prospects of uncovering the root causes of a wide range of common complex human diseases and disorders. These developments may well lead to many new diagnostic and therapeutic products emerging over the coming years. The potential commercial payoffs are enormous. Crucial to all of this is the ability to obtain, store and use human biological materials—materials which, as Hardcastle observes in this often excellent and highly readable book on the English law1 surrounding human bodies and separated biological materials, many now regard as ‘valuable commodities’ in their own right.2 Yet, these developments raise a thorny and hotly debated question, one posed and tackled in this book: what rights, if any, donors of biological samples (termed ‘sources’ by Hardcastle) should be accorded under the law, so...
Key concepts: Biobank, Globe, Intellectual property, Property (philosophy), Variety (cybernetics), Law and economics, Business, Environmental ethics