2006•Journal of Statistical Computation and SimulationRequires access

A simulation study of statistical tests in logistic measurement error models

Magne Thoresen, Petter Laake

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Measurement error models in logistic regression have been subject to much research during the last 10–15 years. In this work, we will focus on statistical testing in these models. We will compare the measurement error likelihood ratio test with a Wald-type test based on the so-called regression calibration method with both asymptotic- and bootstrap standard errors, and the score test, in some finite sample situations. We find that all tests perform approximately equally with regard to empirical power. With regard to the empirical test size, the Wald-type test based on the asymptotic standard error was too conservative, whereas the Wald-type test based on a trimmed boostrap standard error performed quite unstably. In summary, we will recommend the use of likelihood ratio tests or score tests in logistic measurement error situations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Measurement error models in logistic regression have been subject to much research during the last 10–15 years. In this work, we will focus on statistical testing in these models. We will compare the measurement error likelihood ratio test with a Wald-type test based on the so-called regression calibration method with both asymptotic- and bootstrap standard errors, and the score test, in some finite sample situations. We find that all tests perform approximately equally with regard to empirical power. With regard to the empirical test size, the Wald-type test based on the asymptotic standard error was too conservative, whereas the Wald-type test based on a trimmed boostrap standard error performed quite unstably. In summary, we will recommend the use of likelihood ratio tests or score tests in logistic measurement error situations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Measurement error models in logistic regression have been subject to much research during the last 10–15 years. In this work, we will focus on statistical testing in these models. We will compare the measurement error likelihood ratio test with a Wald-type test based on the so-called regression calibration method with both asymptotic- and bootstrap standard errors, and the score test, in some finite sample situations. We find that all tests perform approximately equally with regard to empirical power. With regard to the empirical test size, the Wald-type test based on the asymptotic standard error was too conservative, whereas the Wald-type test based on a trimmed boostrap standard error performed quite unstably. In summary, we will recommend the use of likelihood ratio tests or score tests in logistic measurement error situations.

Key concepts: Wald test, Type I and type II errors, Statistics, Logistic regression, Mathematics, Score test, Statistical hypothesis testing, Nominal level

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A simulation study of statistical tests in logistic measurement error models — Research Paper | ScholarLens