2007Medical PhysicsRequires access

WE‐C‐BRA‐01: Introduction

Alan E. Nahum

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Advances in technology and in computing have given us computer‐controlled linear accelerators equipped with multileaf collimators and wonderful 3D graphics workstations to perform treatment planning; additionally we have conceptual advances such as stereotaxy (cranial and extra‐cranial) intensity modulation (IMRT), helical tomotherapy and protons. But the bottom line in radiotherapy is radiobiology, radiobiology, radiobiology. If we don't know how to convert ‘physics’, i.e. dose distributions, into estimates of clinical outcome then these wonderful technological advances will remain ‘toys’ for physicists to play with. Radiobiology has traditionally concerned itself with determining surviving fraction vs. (uniform) dose curves for human tumour cell lines. However, in the 3D era we need models which connect dose distributions (and fractionation regimens) in tumours and normal tissues (generally in the form of dose‐volume histograms) with the probabilities of tumour (local) control — TCP — and of complications — NTCP. Such models now exist and their active use in treatment planning ushers in the era of Conformal Radiobiology. Educational Objectives: 1. Appreciate the limitations of technology‐driven dose‐based radiotherapy. 2. Appreciate the limitations of ‘classical’ radiobiology in the conformal era. 3. Understand what is meant by ‘Conformal Radiobiology’.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Advances in technology and in computing have given us computer‐controlled linear accelerators equipped with multileaf collimators and wonderful 3D graphics workstations to perform treatment planning; additionally we have conceptual advances such as stereotaxy (cranial and extra‐cranial) intensity modulation (IMRT), helical tomotherapy and protons. But the bottom line in radiotherapy is radiobiology, radiobiology, radiobiology. If we don't know how to convert ‘physics’, i.e. dose distributions, into estimates of clinical outcome then these wonderful technological advances will remain ‘toys’ for physicists to play with. Radiobiology has traditionally concerned itself with determining surviving fraction vs. (uniform) dose curves for human tumour cell lines. However, in the 3D era we need models which connect dose distributions (and fractionation regimens) in tumours and normal tissues (generally in the form of dose‐volume histograms) with the probabilities of tumour (local) control — TCP — and of complications — NTCP. Such models now exist and their active use in treatment planning ushers in the era of Conformal Radiobiology. Educational Objectives: 1. Appreciate the limitations of technology‐driven dose‐based radiotherapy. 2. Appreciate the limitations of ‘classical’ radiobiology in the conformal era. 3. Understand what is meant by ‘Conformal Radiobiology’.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Advances in technology and in computing have given us computer‐controlled linear accelerators equipped with multileaf collimators and wonderful 3D graphics workstations to perform treatment planning; additionally we have conceptual advances such as stereotaxy (cranial and extra‐cranial) intensity modulation (IMRT), helical tomotherapy and protons. But the bottom line in radiotherapy is radiobiology, radiobiology, radiobiology. If we don't know how to convert ‘physics’, i.e. dose distributions, into estimates of clinical outcome then these wonderful technological advances will remain ‘toys’ for physicists to play with. Radiobiology has traditionally concerned itself with determining surviving fraction vs. (uniform) dose curves for human tumour cell lines. However, in the 3D era we need models which connect dose distributions (and fractionation regimens) in tumours and normal tissues (generally in the form of dose‐volume histograms) with the probabilities of tumour (local) control — TCP — and of complications — NTCP. Such models now exist and their active use in treatment planning ushers in the era of Conformal Radiobiology. Educational Objectives: 1. Appreciate the limitations of technology‐driven dose‐based radiotherapy. 2. Appreciate the limitations of ‘classical’ radiobiology in the conformal era. 3. Understand what is meant by ‘Conformal Radiobiology’.

Key concepts: Radiobiology, Tomotherapy, Medical physics, Radiation treatment planning, Radiation therapy, Dosimetry, Nuclear medicine, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
WE‐C‐BRA‐01: Introduction — Research Paper | ScholarLens