2004ClimactericRequires access

A comparative study of breast cell proliferation during hormone replacement therapy: effects of tibolone and continuous combined estrogen–progestogen treatment

Peter Conner, Alexander Christow, Wendy M. Kersemaekers, Gunnar Söderqvist, Lambert Skoog, Kjell Carlström, Edneia Tani, Mirjam Mol-Arts, Bo von Schoultz

Open publisher page 53 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use the fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy technique to compare the effects of tibolone, conventional hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and placebo on breast cell proliferation in postmenopausal women. METHODS: A total of 91 women were randomized to receive either estradiol 2 mg plus norethisterone acetate 1 mg (E2/NETA), tibolone 2.5 mg or placebo for 6 months in a prospective double-blind trial. Breast cell proliferation was assessed using the Ki-67/MIB-1 monoclonal antibody. RESULTS: From the 83 women who completed the study, a total of 166 FNA biopsies were obtained, and 118 of these aspirates (71%) were evaluable for MIB-1 content. Women with assessable biopsies were younger, had a lower body mass index, and had higher levels of sex hormone binding globulin and insulin-like growth factor-I than women in whom the cell yield was insufficient. During treatment with E2/NETA, there was an increase in proliferation (percentage of MIB-1) from a mean value of 2.2 to 6.4% after 6 months (p < 0.01). No significant changes were recorded during treatment with tibolone or placebo. There was a negative association between proliferation and serum levels of total (r(s) = -0.29, p < 0.05) and free (rs = -0.31, p < 0.03) testosterone. CONCLUSIONS: Tibolone seems to have little influence on breast cell proliferation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To use the fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy technique to compare the effects of tibolone, conventional hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and placebo on breast cell proliferation in postmenopausal women. METHODS: A total of 91 women were randomized to receive either estradiol 2 mg plus norethisterone acetate 1 mg (E2/NETA), tibolone 2.5 mg or placebo for 6 months in a prospective double-blind trial. Breast cell proliferation was assessed using the Ki-67/MIB-1 monoclonal antibody. RESULTS: From the 83 women who completed the study, a total of 166 FNA biopsies were obtained, and 118 of these aspirates (71%) were evaluable for MIB-1 content. Women with assessable biopsies were younger, had a lower body mass index, and had higher levels of sex hormone binding globulin and insulin-like growth factor-I than women in whom the cell yield was insufficient. During treatment with E2/NETA, there was an increase in proliferation (percentage of MIB-1) from a mean value of 2.2 to 6.4% after 6 months (p < 0.01). No significant changes were recorded during treatment with tibolone or placebo. There was a negative association between proliferation and serum levels of total (r(s) = -0.29, p < 0.05) and free (rs = -0.31, p < 0.03) testosterone. CONCLUSIONS: Tibolone seems to have little influence on breast cell proliferation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 53 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use the fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy technique to compare the effects of tibolone, conventional hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and placebo on breast cell proliferation in postmenopausal women. METHODS: A total of 91 women were randomized to receive either estradiol 2 mg plus norethisterone acetate 1 mg (E2/NETA), tibolone 2.5 mg or placebo for 6 months in a prospective double-blind trial. Breast cell proliferation was assessed using the Ki-67/MIB-1 monoclonal antibody. RESULTS: From the 83 women who completed the study, a total of 166 FNA biopsies were obtained, and 118 of these aspirates (71%) were evaluable for MIB-1 content. Women with assessable biopsies were younger, had a lower body mass index, and had higher levels of sex hormone binding globulin and insulin-like growth factor-I than women in whom the cell yield was insufficient. During treatment with E2/NETA, there was an increase in proliferation (percentage of MIB-1) from a mean value of 2.2 to 6.4% after 6 months (p < 0.01). No significant changes were recorded during treatment with tibolone or placebo. There was a negative association between proliferation and serum levels of total (r(s) = -0.29, p < 0.05) and free (rs = -0.31, p < 0.03) testosterone. CONCLUSIONS: Tibolone seems to have little influence on breast cell proliferation.

Key concepts: Tibolone, Medicine, Norethisterone acetate, Norethisterone, Progestogen, Internal medicine, Placebo, Endocrinology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of breast cell proliferation during hormone replacement therapy: effects of tibolone and continuous combined estrogen–progestogen treatment — Research Paper | ScholarLens