2000Pacifica Review Peace Security & Global ChangeOpen access

The Great Powers and Genocide: Lessons from Rwanda

Edward A. Kolodziej

Open full text 37 citations

Abstract

This article is divided into three sections. The first summarises the prevailing, if circumscribed, moral and legal consensus against genocide and outlines three lines of argument to broaden the foundation of this consensus. The second section briefly dissects the Rwandan genocide and identifies the principal political and strategic constraints explaining the failure of the United Nations and the great powers to address either the Rwandan crisis or genocide more widely since the formation of the United Nations. On the basis of this diagnosis of why moral and legal prohibitions against genocide do not match the political and strategic incentives to end this practice, a final section proposes practical steps to bridge this gap to strengthen the capacity of the United Nations to create an effective anti-genocide regime.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article is divided into three sections. The first summarises the prevailing, if circumscribed, moral and legal consensus against genocide and outlines three lines of argument to broaden the foundation of this consensus. The second section briefly dissects the Rwandan genocide and identifies the principal political and strategic constraints explaining the failure of the United Nations and the great powers to address either the Rwandan crisis or genocide more widely since the formation of the United Nations. On the basis of this diagnosis of why moral and legal prohibitions against genocide do not match the political and strategic incentives to end this practice, a final section proposes practical steps to bridge this gap to strengthen the capacity of the United Nations to create an effective anti-genocide regime.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article is divided into three sections. The first summarises the prevailing, if circumscribed, moral and legal consensus against genocide and outlines three lines of argument to broaden the foundation of this consensus. The second section briefly dissects the Rwandan genocide and identifies the principal political and strategic constraints explaining the failure of the United Nations and the great powers to address either the Rwandan crisis or genocide more widely since the formation of the United Nations. On the basis of this diagnosis of why moral and legal prohibitions against genocide do not match the political and strategic incentives to end this practice, a final section proposes practical steps to bridge this gap to strengthen the capacity of the United Nations to create an effective anti-genocide regime.

Key concepts: Genocide, Argument (complex analysis), Politics, Political science, Incentive, Principal (computer security), Law, Law and economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Great Powers and Genocide: Lessons from Rwanda — Research Paper | ScholarLens