Elastic and Viscoelastic Foundation Models
Arnold D. Kerr
Abstract
Arnold D. Kerr
Abstract
The present paper contains a critical study of a number of foundation models as well as a further development of some of the ideas involved. Among others it is shown that the Pasternak foundation is a mechanical model for the so-called “generalized” foundation. It is also demonstrated that the kernel for the Pasternak foundation in plane stress or plane strain is identical with Wieghardt’s exponential kernel, and that for the three-dimensional case the kernel is a modified Bessel function. It is also shown that the “non solvability” of the problem of a finite beam or plate resting on a continuous foundation as posed by Wieghardt and further elaborated by Pflanz is not correct, and that problems of this type are solvable for any load distribution permissible in classical plate theory. Throughout the paper, emphasis is placed on the proper mathematical formulation of the physical problems in question.
OpenAlex reports 829 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The present paper contains a critical study of a number of foundation models as well as a further development of some of the ideas involved. Among others it is shown that the Pasternak foundation is a mechanical model for the so-called “generalized” foundation. It is also demonstrated that the kernel for the Pasternak foundation in plane stress or plane strain is identical with Wieghardt’s exponential kernel, and that for the three-dimensional case the kernel is a modified Bessel function. It is also shown that the “non solvability” of the problem of a finite beam or plate resting on a continuous foundation as posed by Wieghardt and further elaborated by Pflanz is not correct, and that problems of this type are solvable for any load distribution permissible in classical plate theory. Throughout the paper, emphasis is placed on the proper mathematical formulation of the physical problems in question.
Key concepts: Foundation (evidence), Bessel function, Viscoelasticity, Mathematics, Kernel (algebra), Mathematical analysis, Stress (linguistics), Plane (geometry)