2002Clinical & Laboratory HaematologyRequires access

Audit of anticoagulant therapy and acute hospital admissions

H. M. HIRRI, P. J. Green

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

We conducted an audit on the contribution of failure of control of anticoagulant therapy to acute hospital admissions. Over a period of 3 months there were 1480 acute admissions. One-hundred-and-twelve (7.6%) of these patients were on anticoagulant therapy. One-hundred-and-three of these 112 patients were evaluated, 74 patients had international normalized ratios (INRs) in the therapeutic range, of whom four (5.4%) bled from causes unlikely to be due directly to anticoagulant therapy. Twenty-nine patients were over-anticoagulated. Of these, 17 (59%) were admitted with bleeding symptoms, which may have been a consequence of high INR, while one had a very high INR but no bleeding. Eleven more patients were admitted for reasons unrelated to anticoagulant therapy but were found to have over-therapeutic INRs, which may have influenced their subsequent hospital management. The only clear difference between the bleeding and nonbleeding groups was age. Reasons for over-anticoagulation were poor patient compliance in 31%, influence of other medications in 17, congestive heart failure in 28%, and unknown in 24%. In conclusion, 22/1480 hospital admissions (1.5%) were due to warfarin complications and 16/21 bleeding patients had INRs > 4.5. These are admissions that could potentially be avoided with better anticoagulation control.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We conducted an audit on the contribution of failure of control of anticoagulant therapy to acute hospital admissions. Over a period of 3 months there were 1480 acute admissions. One-hundred-and-twelve (7.6%) of these patients were on anticoagulant therapy. One-hundred-and-three of these 112 patients were evaluated, 74 patients had international normalized ratios (INRs) in the therapeutic range, of whom four (5.4%) bled from causes unlikely to be due directly to anticoagulant therapy. Twenty-nine patients were over-anticoagulated. Of these, 17 (59%) were admitted with bleeding symptoms, which may have been a consequence of high INR, while one had a very high INR but no bleeding. Eleven more patients were admitted for reasons unrelated to anticoagulant therapy but were found to have over-therapeutic INRs, which may have influenced their subsequent hospital management. The only clear difference between the bleeding and nonbleeding groups was age. Reasons for over-anticoagulation were poor patient compliance in 31%, influence of other medications in 17, congestive heart failure in 28%, and unknown in 24%. In conclusion, 22/1480 hospital admissions (1.5%) were due to warfarin complications and 16/21 bleeding patients had INRs > 4.5. These are admissions that could potentially be avoided with better anticoagulation control.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We conducted an audit on the contribution of failure of control of anticoagulant therapy to acute hospital admissions. Over a period of 3 months there were 1480 acute admissions. One-hundred-and-twelve (7.6%) of these patients were on anticoagulant therapy. One-hundred-and-three of these 112 patients were evaluated, 74 patients had international normalized ratios (INRs) in the therapeutic range, of whom four (5.4%) bled from causes unlikely to be due directly to anticoagulant therapy. Twenty-nine patients were over-anticoagulated. Of these, 17 (59%) were admitted with bleeding symptoms, which may have been a consequence of high INR, while one had a very high INR but no bleeding. Eleven more patients were admitted for reasons unrelated to anticoagulant therapy but were found to have over-therapeutic INRs, which may have influenced their subsequent hospital management. The only clear difference between the bleeding and nonbleeding groups was age. Reasons for over-anticoagulation were poor patient compliance in 31%, influence of other medications in 17, congestive heart failure in 28%, and unknown in 24%. In conclusion, 22/1480 hospital admissions (1.5%) were due to warfarin complications and 16/21 bleeding patients had INRs > 4.5. These are admissions that could potentially be avoided with better anticoagulation control.

Key concepts: Medicine, Warfarin, Anticoagulant therapy, Anticoagulant, Audit, Emergency medicine, Surgery, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Audit of anticoagulant therapy and acute hospital admissions — Research Paper | ScholarLens