1990Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingRequires access

A Model for Evaluation and Training in Aircrew Coordination and Cockpit Resource Management

Robert Simon, Daniel T. Risser, Eugene A. Pawlik, Dennis K. Leedom

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

To improve crew coordination in aviation operations, the Army has adopted an Aircrew Coordination Training (ACT) program. However, the Army does not have a reliable, objective set of metrics for assessing the extent of the resulting crew coordination. Consequently, ARIARDA and DRC developed measures of aircrew coordination to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of the Army ACT program. A rational approach to evaluation requires that assessment be structured and tied to well-defined objectives. The initial stages of the project were driven by the recognition of two crucial deficiencies. First, there was no fundamental conceptual framework for aircrew coordination articulated in the literature. Second, most ACT evaluation schemes were based on measuring attitude change, rather than attitudes and behavior. To remedy these deficiencies, a conceptual model of aircrew coordination was developed and coordination objectives were established. Based on this work, an aircrew coordination evaluation measurement suite was constructed to measure both attitudes and behaviors. This work will assist in moving ACT programs to a much sounder footing since many ACT courses have been criticized for being too “soft.” The ARIARDA project, with a robust theoretical model and associated behavioral outcomes, will integrate ACT training and evaluation in the Army. Moreover, because the model is general, it can provide guidance to other agencies developing crew coordination training or evaluation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To improve crew coordination in aviation operations, the Army has adopted an Aircrew Coordination Training (ACT) program. However, the Army does not have a reliable, objective set of metrics for assessing the extent of the resulting crew coordination. Consequently, ARIARDA and DRC developed measures of aircrew coordination to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of the Army ACT program. A rational approach to evaluation requires that assessment be structured and tied to well-defined objectives. The initial stages of the project were driven by the recognition of two crucial deficiencies. First, there was no fundamental conceptual framework for aircrew coordination articulated in the literature. Second, most ACT evaluation schemes were based on measuring attitude change, rather than attitudes and behavior. To remedy these deficiencies, a conceptual model of aircrew coordination was developed and coordination objectives were established. Based on this work, an aircrew coordination evaluation measurement suite was constructed to measure both attitudes and behaviors. This work will assist in moving ACT programs to a much sounder footing since many ACT courses have been criticized for being too “soft.” The ARIARDA project, with a robust theoretical model and associated behavioral outcomes, will integrate ACT training and evaluation in the Army. Moreover, because the model is general, it can provide guidance to other agencies developing crew coordination training or evaluation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To improve crew coordination in aviation operations, the Army has adopted an Aircrew Coordination Training (ACT) program. However, the Army does not have a reliable, objective set of metrics for assessing the extent of the resulting crew coordination. Consequently, ARIARDA and DRC developed measures of aircrew coordination to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of the Army ACT program. A rational approach to evaluation requires that assessment be structured and tied to well-defined objectives. The initial stages of the project were driven by the recognition of two crucial deficiencies. First, there was no fundamental conceptual framework for aircrew coordination articulated in the literature. Second, most ACT evaluation schemes were based on measuring attitude change, rather than attitudes and behavior. To remedy these deficiencies, a conceptual model of aircrew coordination was developed and coordination objectives were established. Based on this work, an aircrew coordination evaluation measurement suite was constructed to measure both attitudes and behaviors. This work will assist in moving ACT programs to a much sounder footing since many ACT courses have been criticized for being too “soft.” The ARIARDA project, with a robust theoretical model and associated behavioral outcomes, will integrate ACT training and evaluation in the Army. Moreover, because the model is general, it can provide guidance to other agencies developing crew coordination training or evaluation.

Key concepts: Aircrew, Crew, Cockpit, Crew resource management, Aeronautics, Work (physics), Suite, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Model for Evaluation and Training in Aircrew Coordination and Cockpit Resource Management — Research Paper | ScholarLens