2008Performance Improvement QuarterlyRequires access

Assessing Training Needs of HIV Program Providers

Catherine M. Sleezer, Melanie Spector

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

This article describes a mixed-methods needs assessment, or developmental evaluation, that was conducted for the providers and stakeholders of Oklahoma's community-based organizations (CBOs). The needs assessment, which was the first phase in developing training on outcome monitoring for their HIV prevention programs, relied on three evaluation approaches: Behavioral-objectives, participatory, and empowerment. This article describes the background for the needs assessment, the needs assessment process, and the lessons learned. When dealing with such a complex issue as HIV prevention where multiple goals must be achieved for success, a mixed-methods approach to needs assessment may better capture real-world needs. Furthermore, it may increase acceptance of the needs assessment findings and conclusions by the diverse groups that have a stake in the evaluation. However, as this study exemplified, implementing and reporting a mixed-methods needs assessment that is based on differing evaluation approaches is complex, challenging, and resource intensive. This study can contribute to theory building for mixed-methods evaluation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article describes a mixed-methods needs assessment, or developmental evaluation, that was conducted for the providers and stakeholders of Oklahoma's community-based organizations (CBOs). The needs assessment, which was the first phase in developing training on outcome monitoring for their HIV prevention programs, relied on three evaluation approaches: Behavioral-objectives, participatory, and empowerment. This article describes the background for the needs assessment, the needs assessment process, and the lessons learned. When dealing with such a complex issue as HIV prevention where multiple goals must be achieved for success, a mixed-methods approach to needs assessment may better capture real-world needs. Furthermore, it may increase acceptance of the needs assessment findings and conclusions by the diverse groups that have a stake in the evaluation. However, as this study exemplified, implementing and reporting a mixed-methods needs assessment that is based on differing evaluation approaches is complex, challenging, and resource intensive. This study can contribute to theory building for mixed-methods evaluation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article describes a mixed-methods needs assessment, or developmental evaluation, that was conducted for the providers and stakeholders of Oklahoma's community-based organizations (CBOs). The needs assessment, which was the first phase in developing training on outcome monitoring for their HIV prevention programs, relied on three evaluation approaches: Behavioral-objectives, participatory, and empowerment. This article describes the background for the needs assessment, the needs assessment process, and the lessons learned. When dealing with such a complex issue as HIV prevention where multiple goals must be achieved for success, a mixed-methods approach to needs assessment may better capture real-world needs. Furthermore, it may increase acceptance of the needs assessment findings and conclusions by the diverse groups that have a stake in the evaluation. However, as this study exemplified, implementing and reporting a mixed-methods needs assessment that is based on differing evaluation approaches is complex, challenging, and resource intensive. This study can contribute to theory building for mixed-methods evaluation.

Key concepts: Needs assessment, Empowerment, Program evaluation, Participatory evaluation, Process (computing), Resource (disambiguation), Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Knowledge management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessing Training Needs of HIV Program Providers — Research Paper | ScholarLens