1928•JAMARequires access

THE ETIOLOGY AND RESULTS OF TREATMENT IN ANGIONEUROTIC EDEMA AND URTICARIA

Frank R. Menagh

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

This paper embodies the experience gained in the study and treatment of 260 cases of angioneurotic edema and urticaria. No distinction is made between these two disorders. It is assumed that they are the same process, involving in the case of urticaria the superficial layers of the skin, and in angioneurotic edema the subcutaneous tissues. In some instances other tissues may be involved also, as in the type of epilepsy due to allergic reaction. The point of view from which these observations are made is that in these cases the disorder is allergic, and that in every case there is a definite etiology. This etiologic factor is always the absorption of some foreign protein by a sensitive individual, just as in hay-fever and bronchial asthma. Successful treatment in hay-fever and bronchial asthma depends on first determining what foreign protein or proteins are responsible for the reaction. The offending substance is

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper embodies the experience gained in the study and treatment of 260 cases of angioneurotic edema and urticaria. No distinction is made between these two disorders. It is assumed that they are the same process, involving in the case of urticaria the superficial layers of the skin, and in angioneurotic edema the subcutaneous tissues. In some instances other tissues may be involved also, as in the type of epilepsy due to allergic reaction. The point of view from which these observations are made is that in these cases the disorder is allergic, and that in every case there is a definite etiology. This etiologic factor is always the absorption of some foreign protein by a sensitive individual, just as in hay-fever and bronchial asthma. Successful treatment in hay-fever and bronchial asthma depends on first determining what foreign protein or proteins are responsible for the reaction. The offending substance is

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper embodies the experience gained in the study and treatment of 260 cases of angioneurotic edema and urticaria. No distinction is made between these two disorders. It is assumed that they are the same process, involving in the case of urticaria the superficial layers of the skin, and in angioneurotic edema the subcutaneous tissues. In some instances other tissues may be involved also, as in the type of epilepsy due to allergic reaction. The point of view from which these observations are made is that in these cases the disorder is allergic, and that in every case there is a definite etiology. This etiologic factor is always the absorption of some foreign protein by a sensitive individual, just as in hay-fever and bronchial asthma. Successful treatment in hay-fever and bronchial asthma depends on first determining what foreign protein or proteins are responsible for the reaction. The offending substance is

Key concepts: Medicine, Hay fever, Etiology, Angioedema, Edema, Dermatology, Asthma, Immunology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE ETIOLOGY AND RESULTS OF TREATMENT IN ANGIONEUROTIC EDEMA AND URTICARIA — Research Paper | ScholarLens