2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Four types of typical discrete Choice Models: Which are you using?

Lijun Yu, Sun Bin

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Four types of typical discrete Choice Models: Multinomial logit (MNL) model, Nested logit (NL)model, Heteroscedastic Extreme Value (HEV)Model and Mixed logit model, have been proposed and implemented in empirical investigations, although there is no universally acknowledged using principle. Here we report study to test this type of models in a travel mode choice case. We implemented four models calibration using software programmed by ourselves. We found that if sample data satisfied with IIA property, our experience has confirmed that MNL is the first choice in mode split forecasting. The nested logit model and Heteroscedastic Extreme Value (HEV)Model are not significantly better than the multinomial logit model. Mixed logit model corrects IIA flaw, but is somewhat more difficult to estimate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Four types of typical discrete Choice Models: Multinomial logit (MNL) model, Nested logit (NL)model, Heteroscedastic Extreme Value (HEV)Model and Mixed logit model, have been proposed and implemented in empirical investigations, although there is no universally acknowledged using principle. Here we report study to test this type of models in a travel mode choice case. We implemented four models calibration using software programmed by ourselves. We found that if sample data satisfied with IIA property, our experience has confirmed that MNL is the first choice in mode split forecasting. The nested logit model and Heteroscedastic Extreme Value (HEV)Model are not significantly better than the multinomial logit model. Mixed logit model corrects IIA flaw, but is somewhat more difficult to estimate.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Four types of typical discrete Choice Models: Multinomial logit (MNL) model, Nested logit (NL)model, Heteroscedastic Extreme Value (HEV)Model and Mixed logit model, have been proposed and implemented in empirical investigations, although there is no universally acknowledged using principle. Here we report study to test this type of models in a travel mode choice case. We implemented four models calibration using software programmed by ourselves. We found that if sample data satisfied with IIA property, our experience has confirmed that MNL is the first choice in mode split forecasting. The nested logit model and Heteroscedastic Extreme Value (HEV)Model are not significantly better than the multinomial logit model. Mixed logit model corrects IIA flaw, but is somewhat more difficult to estimate.

Key concepts: Multinomial logistic regression, Discrete choice, Heteroscedasticity, Mixed logit, Econometrics, Logistic regression, Sample (material), Generalized extreme value distribution

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Four types of typical discrete Choice Models: Which are you using? — Research Paper | ScholarLens