2014Archives of Disease in ChildhoodRequires access

O-187 Will Oral Rehydration At The Emergency Department In This Young Child With Acute Gastroenteritis Fail?

Dorien Geurts, Yvonne Vergouwe, HA Moll, Rianne Oostenbrink

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background Although oral rehydration guidelines are widely implemented, some children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE) at the emergency department (ED) fail standardised oral rehydration therapy. Aim To identify predictors for failure of oral rehydration in children with AGE. Methods Design prospective, observational study. Setting ED Erasmus University Medical Centre – Sophia Children’s Hospital, 2010- 2012. Patients Children 1 month- 5 years of age with AGE. Outcome Failure of oral rehydration, defined by 1) nasogastric tube (NGT) rehydration after oral rehydration was primarily started, 2) intravenous rehydration, 3) hospitalisation, all at initial visit or 4) revisit within 72 h after discharge from the ED. (Preliminary) results Of 225 included patients (99.5% mild to moderately dehydrated): 44 patients failed oral rehydration (50.0% male, median age 1.07 (IQR 0.8–2.0), 181 patients were successfully rehydrated (54.1% male, median age 1.8 (IQR 0.9–2.4). There were no differences in age, vital signs or dehydration score between successfully and failed rehydrated patients. Patients in whom rehydration failed complained significantly more often of vomiting (p 0.01) and were in a higher triage urgency category (p 0.07) at initial presentation. MTS urgency level (OR 0.3 CI 95% 0.09–0.83) and vomiting > 4 times/ day were predictors of failure (OR 0.4 CI 95% 0.13–1.0), age and diarrhoea frequency were not. Conclusion In young children with AGE who failed oral rehydration at the ED, MTS urgency and vomiting > 4 times/ day were predictors of failure, in contrast to age and diarrhoea frequency.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background Although oral rehydration guidelines are widely implemented, some children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE) at the emergency department (ED) fail standardised oral rehydration therapy. Aim To identify predictors for failure of oral rehydration in children with AGE. Methods Design prospective, observational study. Setting ED Erasmus University Medical Centre – Sophia Children’s Hospital, 2010- 2012. Patients Children 1 month- 5 years of age with AGE. Outcome Failure of oral rehydration, defined by 1) nasogastric tube (NGT) rehydration after oral rehydration was primarily started, 2) intravenous rehydration, 3) hospitalisation, all at initial visit or 4) revisit within 72 h after discharge from the ED. (Preliminary) results Of 225 included patients (99.5% mild to moderately dehydrated): 44 patients failed oral rehydration (50.0% male, median age 1.07 (IQR 0.8–2.0), 181 patients were successfully rehydrated (54.1% male, median age 1.8 (IQR 0.9–2.4). There were no differences in age, vital signs or dehydration score between successfully and failed rehydrated patients. Patients in whom rehydration failed complained significantly more often of vomiting (p 0.01) and were in a higher triage urgency category (p 0.07) at initial presentation. MTS urgency level (OR 0.3 CI 95% 0.09–0.83) and vomiting > 4 times/ day were predictors of failure (OR 0.4 CI 95% 0.13–1.0), age and diarrhoea frequency were not. Conclusion In young children with AGE who failed oral rehydration at the ED, MTS urgency and vomiting > 4 times/ day were predictors of failure, in contrast to age and diarrhoea frequency.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background Although oral rehydration guidelines are widely implemented, some children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE) at the emergency department (ED) fail standardised oral rehydration therapy. Aim To identify predictors for failure of oral rehydration in children with AGE. Methods Design prospective, observational study. Setting ED Erasmus University Medical Centre – Sophia Children’s Hospital, 2010- 2012. Patients Children 1 month- 5 years of age with AGE. Outcome Failure of oral rehydration, defined by 1) nasogastric tube (NGT) rehydration after oral rehydration was primarily started, 2) intravenous rehydration, 3) hospitalisation, all at initial visit or 4) revisit within 72 h after discharge from the ED. (Preliminary) results Of 225 included patients (99.5% mild to moderately dehydrated): 44 patients failed oral rehydration (50.0% male, median age 1.07 (IQR 0.8–2.0), 181 patients were successfully rehydrated (54.1% male, median age 1.8 (IQR 0.9–2.4). There were no differences in age, vital signs or dehydration score between successfully and failed rehydrated patients. Patients in whom rehydration failed complained significantly more often of vomiting (p 0.01) and were in a higher triage urgency category (p 0.07) at initial presentation. MTS urgency level (OR 0.3 CI 95% 0.09–0.83) and vomiting > 4 times/ day were predictors of failure (OR 0.4 CI 95% 0.13–1.0), age and diarrhoea frequency were not. Conclusion In young children with AGE who failed oral rehydration at the ED, MTS urgency and vomiting > 4 times/ day were predictors of failure, in contrast to age and diarrhoea frequency.

Key concepts: Medicine, Oral rehydration therapy, Vomiting, Emergency department, Pediatrics, Acute gastroenteritis, Observational study, Triage

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
O-187 Will Oral Rehydration At The Emergency Department In This Young Child With Acute Gastroenteritis Fail? — Research Paper | ScholarLens