2011•Agronomy JournalRequires access

Yield and Composition of Sweet Pearl Millet as Affected by Row Spacing and Seeding Rate

Audrey Bouchard, Anne Vanasse, Philippe Séguin, Gilles Bélanger

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

Sweet pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. BR.] seems promising for ethanol production, but optimal cropping practices are unknown for the cool and humid conditions of eastern Canada. We evaluated the effects of two row spacings (18 and 36 cm) and four seeding rates (5, 10, 15, and 20 kg ha−1) on biomass dry matter (DM) yield, water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) concentration and yield, and nutritive value of sweet pearl millet at two sites in Québec, Canada. Increasing seeding rates decreased biomass DM and WSC yields at Sainte‐Anne‐de‐Bellevue but had a limited effect at Saint‐Augustin‐de‐Desmaures. Hence, a seeding rate of 5 kg ha−1 resulted in maximum biomass DM (12.4–19.1 Mg ha−1) and WSC (1.56–2.64 Mg ha−1) yields. Row spacing did not affect biomass DM and WSC yields at Saint‐Augustin‐de‐Desmaures but biomass DM yield was greater at a row spacing of 18 cm at Sainte‐Anne‐de‐Bellevue. The WSC concentrations in leaves and stems were inconsistently affected by seeding rate but were not affected by row spacing. The WSC concentrations were greater in stems (140.7–162.4 g kg−1 DM) than in leaves (35.7–48.1 g kg−1 DM). Increasing the seeding rate generally decreased N concentrations of leaves and stems and digestibility of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) but increased concentrations of acid detergent fiber and NDF. Row spacing did not affect any nutritive value attributes. Seeding at 5 kg ha−1 with a row spacing of 18 cm maximize biomass and WSC yield with minimal effect on forage nutritive value of sweet pearl millet.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sweet pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. BR.] seems promising for ethanol production, but optimal cropping practices are unknown for the cool and humid conditions of eastern Canada. We evaluated the effects of two row spacings (18 and 36 cm) and four seeding rates (5, 10, 15, and 20 kg ha−1) on biomass dry matter (DM) yield, water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) concentration and yield, and nutritive value of sweet pearl millet at two sites in Québec, Canada. Increasing seeding rates decreased biomass DM and WSC yields at Sainte‐Anne‐de‐Bellevue but had a limited effect at Saint‐Augustin‐de‐Desmaures. Hence, a seeding rate of 5 kg ha−1 resulted in maximum biomass DM (12.4–19.1 Mg ha−1) and WSC (1.56–2.64 Mg ha−1) yields. Row spacing did not affect biomass DM and WSC yields at Saint‐Augustin‐de‐Desmaures but biomass DM yield was greater at a row spacing of 18 cm at Sainte‐Anne‐de‐Bellevue. The WSC concentrations in leaves and stems were inconsistently affected by seeding rate but were not affected by row spacing. The WSC concentrations were greater in stems (140.7–162.4 g kg−1 DM) than in leaves (35.7–48.1 g kg−1 DM). Increasing the seeding rate generally decreased N concentrations of leaves and stems and digestibility of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) but increased concentrations of acid detergent fiber and NDF. Row spacing did not affect any nutritive value attributes. Seeding at 5 kg ha−1 with a row spacing of 18 cm maximize biomass and WSC yield with minimal effect on forage nutritive value of sweet pearl millet.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sweet pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. BR.] seems promising for ethanol production, but optimal cropping practices are unknown for the cool and humid conditions of eastern Canada. We evaluated the effects of two row spacings (18 and 36 cm) and four seeding rates (5, 10, 15, and 20 kg ha−1) on biomass dry matter (DM) yield, water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) concentration and yield, and nutritive value of sweet pearl millet at two sites in Québec, Canada. Increasing seeding rates decreased biomass DM and WSC yields at Sainte‐Anne‐de‐Bellevue but had a limited effect at Saint‐Augustin‐de‐Desmaures. Hence, a seeding rate of 5 kg ha−1 resulted in maximum biomass DM (12.4–19.1 Mg ha−1) and WSC (1.56–2.64 Mg ha−1) yields. Row spacing did not affect biomass DM and WSC yields at Saint‐Augustin‐de‐Desmaures but biomass DM yield was greater at a row spacing of 18 cm at Sainte‐Anne‐de‐Bellevue. The WSC concentrations in leaves and stems were inconsistently affected by seeding rate but were not affected by row spacing. The WSC concentrations were greater in stems (140.7–162.4 g kg−1 DM) than in leaves (35.7–48.1 g kg−1 DM). Increasing the seeding rate generally decreased N concentrations of leaves and stems and digestibility of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) but increased concentrations of acid detergent fiber and NDF. Row spacing did not affect any nutritive value attributes. Seeding at 5 kg ha−1 with a row spacing of 18 cm maximize biomass and WSC yield with minimal effect on forage nutritive value of sweet pearl millet.

Key concepts: Seeding, Pennisetum, Neutral Detergent Fiber, Dry matter, Agronomy, Biomass (ecology), Yield (engineering), Animal science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Yield and Composition of Sweet Pearl Millet as Affected by Row Spacing and Seeding Rate — Research Paper | ScholarLens