1996•Pacing and Clinical ElectrophysiologyRequires access

Effects of Flecainide, Encainide, and Clofilium on Ventricular Refractory Period Extension by Transcardiac Shocks

Robert J. Sweeney, Robert Morris Gill, Mitchell I. Steinberg, Philip R. Reid

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The mechanisms by which pharmacological agents alter electrical defibrillation are not fully understood. It has been proposed that, in addition to directly stimulating tissue, defibrillation may involve refractory period extension (RPE) produced by the shock. Accordingly, pharmacological agents might modulate defibrillation by altering RPE. This study examined the effect of Class I and Class III antiarrhythmic agents on RPE by transcardiac shocks. METHODS: In four groups of pentobarbital anesthetized dogs, RPE was measured during rapid ventricular pacing before and after administration of either the Class I agents flecainide (n = 7) or encainide (n = 7), the Class III agent clofilium (n = 7), or vehicle (n = 5). Measurements included QRS duration during sinus rhythm and a conduction time, QTC interval and refractory period, and RPE for 4- to 10-V/cm shocks delivered 20-80 ms before the end of the tissue absolute refractory period. For the 6-V/cm shocks, the interval after the shock during which tissue remained refractory (RIAS) was also computed. RESULTS: Drugs affected QRS duration, conduction time, QTC, and refractory period ( without shocks) in accordance with their anticipated Class I and Class III actions. Without drugs, significant RPE was observed in all animals for all shocks delivered 40 ms or less before the end of the refractory period. Clofilium, encainide, and flecainide had a tendency to increase RPE but only clofilium produced a significant increase. For 6-V/cm shocks with different timings, the minimum RIAS was found to be approximately 43 ms, and occurred for shocks given 20-30 ms before the end of the refractory period. CONCLUSIONS: At drug dosages that produced moderate Class III ( approximately equal to 15%) or strong Class I (approximately equal to 35%) effects, only the Class III agent significantly increased RPE and RIAS. Thus, in addition to altering tissue excitability, the effect of antiarrhythmic agents to increase RPE and the minimum RIAS may help explain their influence on defibrillation threshold.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: The mechanisms by which pharmacological agents alter electrical defibrillation are not fully understood. It has been proposed that, in addition to directly stimulating tissue, defibrillation may involve refractory period extension (RPE) produced by the shock. Accordingly, pharmacological agents might modulate defibrillation by altering RPE. This study examined the effect of Class I and Class III antiarrhythmic agents on RPE by transcardiac shocks. METHODS: In four groups of pentobarbital anesthetized dogs, RPE was measured during rapid ventricular pacing before and after administration of either the Class I agents flecainide (n = 7) or encainide (n = 7), the Class III agent clofilium (n = 7), or vehicle (n = 5). Measurements included QRS duration during sinus rhythm and a conduction time, QTC interval and refractory period, and RPE for 4- to 10-V/cm shocks delivered 20-80 ms before the end of the tissue absolute refractory period. For the 6-V/cm shocks, the interval after the shock during which tissue remained refractory (RIAS) was also computed. RESULTS: Drugs affected QRS duration, conduction time, QTC, and refractory period ( without shocks) in accordance with their anticipated Class I and Class III actions. Without drugs, significant RPE was observed in all animals for all shocks delivered 40 ms or less before the end of the refractory period. Clofilium, encainide, and flecainide had a tendency to increase RPE but only clofilium produced a significant increase. For 6-V/cm shocks with different timings, the minimum RIAS was found to be approximately 43 ms, and occurred for shocks given 20-30 ms before the end of the refractory period. CONCLUSIONS: At drug dosages that produced moderate Class III ( approximately equal to 15%) or strong Class I (approximately equal to 35%) effects, only the Class III agent significantly increased RPE and RIAS. Thus, in addition to altering tissue excitability, the effect of antiarrhythmic agents to increase RPE and the minimum RIAS may help explain their influence on defibrillation threshold.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: The mechanisms by which pharmacological agents alter electrical defibrillation are not fully understood. It has been proposed that, in addition to directly stimulating tissue, defibrillation may involve refractory period extension (RPE) produced by the shock. Accordingly, pharmacological agents might modulate defibrillation by altering RPE. This study examined the effect of Class I and Class III antiarrhythmic agents on RPE by transcardiac shocks. METHODS: In four groups of pentobarbital anesthetized dogs, RPE was measured during rapid ventricular pacing before and after administration of either the Class I agents flecainide (n = 7) or encainide (n = 7), the Class III agent clofilium (n = 7), or vehicle (n = 5). Measurements included QRS duration during sinus rhythm and a conduction time, QTC interval and refractory period, and RPE for 4- to 10-V/cm shocks delivered 20-80 ms before the end of the tissue absolute refractory period. For the 6-V/cm shocks, the interval after the shock during which tissue remained refractory (RIAS) was also computed. RESULTS: Drugs affected QRS duration, conduction time, QTC, and refractory period ( without shocks) in accordance with their anticipated Class I and Class III actions. Without drugs, significant RPE was observed in all animals for all shocks delivered 40 ms or less before the end of the refractory period. Clofilium, encainide, and flecainide had a tendency to increase RPE but only clofilium produced a significant increase. For 6-V/cm shocks with different timings, the minimum RIAS was found to be approximately 43 ms, and occurred for shocks given 20-30 ms before the end of the refractory period. CONCLUSIONS: At drug dosages that produced moderate Class III ( approximately equal to 15%) or strong Class I (approximately equal to 35%) effects, only the Class III agent significantly increased RPE and RIAS. Thus, in addition to altering tissue excitability, the effect of antiarrhythmic agents to increase RPE and the minimum RIAS may help explain their influence on defibrillation threshold.

Key concepts: Flecainide, Refractory period, Medicine, QRS complex, Effective refractory period, Defibrillation, Cardiology, Refractory (planetary science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of Flecainide, Encainide, and Clofilium on Ventricular Refractory Period Extension by Transcardiac Shocks — Research Paper | ScholarLens