The Ability of Aphis craccivora, A. gossypii and A. citricola to Transmit Single and Mixed Viruses to Cowpeas
Julia M. F. Roberts, G. Thottappilly, Chris Hodgson
Abstract
Julia M. F. Roberts, G. Thottappilly, Chris Hodgson
Abstract
Abstract The ability of populations of adult apterous Aphis craccivora, A. gossypii and A. citricola to transmit the cowpea aphid‐borne virus (CAMV) and cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) to cowpea was investigated. CMV was more readily transmitted than CAMV by all three aphid species, but was most readily transmitted by A. craccivora and A. citricola, with transmissions ranging from 64–71 %. With CAMV, the infection level with A. gossypii was higher than with A. craccivora and both were more efficient than A. citricola, although the differences were not significant. With mixed infections of CAMV and CMV, there was a higher level of CAMV transmission using A. craccivora from sequential feeding when CMV‐infected plants were fed on first followed by CAMV‐infected plants, suggesting that cowpea plants were more prone to infection by CAMV when already infected by CMV.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract The ability of populations of adult apterous Aphis craccivora, A. gossypii and A. citricola to transmit the cowpea aphid‐borne virus (CAMV) and cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) to cowpea was investigated. CMV was more readily transmitted than CAMV by all three aphid species, but was most readily transmitted by A. craccivora and A. citricola, with transmissions ranging from 64–71 %. With CAMV, the infection level with A. gossypii was higher than with A. craccivora and both were more efficient than A. citricola, although the differences were not significant. With mixed infections of CAMV and CMV, there was a higher level of CAMV transmission using A. craccivora from sequential feeding when CMV‐infected plants were fed on first followed by CAMV‐infected plants, suggesting that cowpea plants were more prone to infection by CAMV when already infected by CMV.
Key concepts: Biology, Aphis gossypii, Aphis craccivora, Horticulture, Botany, Aphididae, Homoptera, PEST analysis