1986JAMARequires access

Screening for Renovascular Hypertension-Reply

Robert J Havey

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In Reply.— We agree with Drs Bush and Kidd thatbilateralrenal artery stenoses are found in approximately 25% of all cases of renovascular hypertension. The largest published series of patients, the Cooperative Study of Renovascular Hypertension, found bilateral renovascular disease in 28% (250 patients) of their patients with renal artery stenosis.1However, many renal artery lesions are functionally insignificant, since unilateral repair often cures or improves hypertension in patients with bilateral stenoses. For example, Schwarten et al2noted that while 14 of their patients had bilateral renal artery stenosis, nine of these patients responded to only unilateral angioplasty. Furthermore, the Cooperative Study of Renovascular Hypertension noted that in patients with bilateral disease who responded to surgery, 83.3% had abnormal rapid-sequence IVPs. Thus, while the sensitivity of the rapid-sequence IVP is lower in detecting bilateral renal artery stenosis, it remains a useful means of uncovering functionally significant renal vascular

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In Reply.— We agree with Drs Bush and Kidd thatbilateralrenal artery stenoses are found in approximately 25% of all cases of renovascular hypertension. The largest published series of patients, the Cooperative Study of Renovascular Hypertension, found bilateral renovascular disease in 28% (250 patients) of their patients with renal artery stenosis.1However, many renal artery lesions are functionally insignificant, since unilateral repair often cures or improves hypertension in patients with bilateral stenoses. For example, Schwarten et al2noted that while 14 of their patients had bilateral renal artery stenosis, nine of these patients responded to only unilateral angioplasty. Furthermore, the Cooperative Study of Renovascular Hypertension noted that in patients with bilateral disease who responded to surgery, 83.3% had abnormal rapid-sequence IVPs. Thus, while the sensitivity of the rapid-sequence IVP is lower in detecting bilateral renal artery stenosis, it remains a useful means of uncovering functionally significant renal vascular

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In Reply.— We agree with Drs Bush and Kidd thatbilateralrenal artery stenoses are found in approximately 25% of all cases of renovascular hypertension. The largest published series of patients, the Cooperative Study of Renovascular Hypertension, found bilateral renovascular disease in 28% (250 patients) of their patients with renal artery stenosis.1However, many renal artery lesions are functionally insignificant, since unilateral repair often cures or improves hypertension in patients with bilateral stenoses. For example, Schwarten et al2noted that while 14 of their patients had bilateral renal artery stenosis, nine of these patients responded to only unilateral angioplasty. Furthermore, the Cooperative Study of Renovascular Hypertension noted that in patients with bilateral disease who responded to surgery, 83.3% had abnormal rapid-sequence IVPs. Thus, while the sensitivity of the rapid-sequence IVP is lower in detecting bilateral renal artery stenosis, it remains a useful means of uncovering functionally significant renal vascular

Key concepts: Medicine, Renovascular hypertension, Renal artery stenosis, Renal artery, Stenosis, Angioplasty, Renal Artery Obstruction, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Screening for Renovascular Hypertension-Reply — Research Paper | ScholarLens