1965Pacific Journal of MathematicsOpen access

Isomorphic groups and group rings

D. S. Passman

Open full text 70 citations

Abstract

Let © be a finite group, £ a commutative ring with one and S[@] the group ring of © over S. If ξ> is a group with © = £ then clearly S[(S] = S[£>] where the latter is an S-isomorphism.We study here the converse question: For which groups © and rings S does £[©] ^ S[ξ>] imply that © is isomorphic to £)?We consider first the case where S = K is a field.It is known that if © is abelian then Q[@] = Q[ξ>] implies that © = §> where Q is the field of rational numbers.We show here that this result does not extend to all groups ©.In fact by a simple counting argument we exhibit a large set of nonisomorphic p-groups with isomorphic group algebras over all noncharacteristic p fields.Thus for groups in general the only fields if interest are those whose characteristic divides the order of the group.We now let S = R be the ring of integers in some finite algebraic extension of the rationale.We show here that the group ring R[@>] determines the set of normal subgroups of © along with many of the natural operations defined on this set.For example, under the assumption that © is nilpotent, we show that given normal subgroups 3Dΐ and 9ΐ, the group ring determines the commutator subgroup (3JI, 91).Finally we consider several special cases.In particular we show that if © is nilpotent of class 2 then R[(g\ = β[ §] implies © = €>.1* Remarks on group algebras* Recently examples have been given of pairs of groups {©, §} for which K[®] is i£-isomorphic to K[φ] for all fields K whose characteristic does not divide the order of the groups.We show here by a simple counting argument that this is not particularly surprising.This approach was suggested by Professor R. Brauer.We prove THEOREM A. Suppose Q[®] ^ Q[ξ>] where Q is the field of rational numbers.Then for all fields K whose characteristic does not divide | © | = | ξ> |, the order of the groups, we have K[®[ ~ THEOREM B. There exists a set of p B{n) nonisomorphic groups of order p n where B{n) = 2/27 (n 3 -17 n 2 ) which have isomorphic group algebras over all noncharacteristic p fields.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Let © be a finite group, £ a commutative ring with one and S[@] the group ring of © over S. If ξ> is a group with © = £ then clearly S[(S] = S[£>] where the latter is an S-isomorphism.We study here the converse question: For which groups © and rings S does £[©] ^ S[ξ>] imply that © is isomorphic to £)?We consider first the case where S = K is a field.It is known that if © is abelian then Q[@] = Q[ξ>] implies that © = §> where Q is the field of rational numbers.We show here that this result does not extend to all groups ©.In fact by a simple counting argument we exhibit a large set of nonisomorphic p-groups with isomorphic group algebras over all noncharacteristic p fields.Thus for groups in general the only fields if interest are those whose characteristic divides the order of the group.We now let S = R be the ring of integers in some finite algebraic extension of the rationale.We show here that the group ring R[@>] determines the set of normal subgroups of © along with many of the natural operations defined on this set.For example, under the assumption that © is nilpotent, we show that given normal subgroups 3Dΐ and 9ΐ, the group ring determines the commutator subgroup (3JI, 91).Finally we consider several special cases.In particular we show that if © is nilpotent of class 2 then R[(g\ = β[ §] implies © = €>.1* Remarks on group algebras* Recently examples have been given of pairs of groups {©, §} for which K[®] is i£-isomorphic to K[φ] for all fields K whose characteristic does not divide the order of the groups.We show here by a simple counting argument that this is not particularly surprising.This approach was suggested by Professor R. Brauer.We prove THEOREM A. Suppose Q[®] ^ Q[ξ>] where Q is the field of rational numbers.Then for all fields K whose characteristic does not divide | © | = | ξ> |, the order of the groups, we have K[®[ ~ THEOREM B. There exists a set of p B{n) nonisomorphic groups of order p n where B{n) = 2/27 (n 3 -17 n 2 ) which have isomorphic group algebras over all noncharacteristic p fields.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 70 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Let © be a finite group, £ a commutative ring with one and S[@] the group ring of © over S. If ξ> is a group with © = £ then clearly S[(S] = S[£>] where the latter is an S-isomorphism.We study here the converse question: For which groups © and rings S does £[©] ^ S[ξ>] imply that © is isomorphic to £)?We consider first the case where S = K is a field.It is known that if © is abelian then Q[@] = Q[ξ>] implies that © = §> where Q is the field of rational numbers.We show here that this result does not extend to all groups ©.In fact by a simple counting argument we exhibit a large set of nonisomorphic p-groups with isomorphic group algebras over all noncharacteristic p fields.Thus for groups in general the only fields if interest are those whose characteristic divides the order of the group.We now let S = R be the ring of integers in some finite algebraic extension of the rationale.We show here that the group ring R[@>] determines the set of normal subgroups of © along with many of the natural operations defined on this set.For example, under the assumption that © is nilpotent, we show that given normal subgroups 3Dΐ and 9ΐ, the group ring determines the commutator subgroup (3JI, 91).Finally we consider several special cases.In particular we show that if © is nilpotent of class 2 then R[(g\ = β[ §] implies © = €>.1* Remarks on group algebras* Recently examples have been given of pairs of groups {©, §} for which K[®] is i£-isomorphic to K[φ] for all fields K whose characteristic does not divide the order of the groups.We show here by a simple counting argument that this is not particularly surprising.This approach was suggested by Professor R. Brauer.We prove THEOREM A. Suppose Q[®] ^ Q[ξ>] where Q is the field of rational numbers.Then for all fields K whose characteristic does not divide | © | = | ξ> |, the order of the groups, we have K[®[ ~ THEOREM B. There exists a set of p B{n) nonisomorphic groups of order p n where B{n) = 2/27 (n 3 -17 n 2 ) which have isomorphic group algebras over all noncharacteristic p fields.

Key concepts: Mathematics, Group (periodic table), Pure mathematics, Combinatorics, Chemistry, Organic chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Isomorphic groups and group rings — Research Paper | ScholarLens