2003Scandinavian Journal of Infectious DiseasesRequires access

Susceptibility of Skin and Soft-tissue Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes to Topical Antibiotics: Indications of Clonal Spread of Fusidic Acid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Jan Egil Afset, Johan A. Mæland

Open publisher page 29 citations

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus (SA) isolates (n = 255) from outpatients with skin and soft-tissue infections were collected in 3 different areas in Norway. Group A streptococci (GAS, n = 68) were isolated from skin or pharyngotonsillar specimens from outpatients. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of bacitracin, fusidic acid and mupirocin were tested using the E-test. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns of fusidic acid-sensitive (FusS) and -resistant (FusR) SA were compared. All GAS isolates showed MIC of bacitracin of < or = 1.0 mg/l, of mupirocin of < or = 0.125 mg/l and of fusidic acid 1.0-4.0 mg/l. All the SA showed MIC of mupirocin < or = 0.5 mg/l and of bacitracin of > or = 2.0 mg/l, 91% with MIC > or = 16 mg/l. FusR was shown by 32.5% of the SA strains with similar prevalence rates in 3 different geographical areas of Norway. One particular PFGE pattern (type 1) was shown by 76% of the FusR SA. SA of type 1 belonged to phage group II and produced exfoliative toxins. Thus, the results demonstrated a high prevalence of FusR among SA causing skin infections and that this was mainly due to dissemination of clonally related FusR SA.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Staphylococcus aureus (SA) isolates (n = 255) from outpatients with skin and soft-tissue infections were collected in 3 different areas in Norway. Group A streptococci (GAS, n = 68) were isolated from skin or pharyngotonsillar specimens from outpatients. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of bacitracin, fusidic acid and mupirocin were tested using the E-test. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns of fusidic acid-sensitive (FusS) and -resistant (FusR) SA were compared. All GAS isolates showed MIC of bacitracin of < or = 1.0 mg/l, of mupirocin of < or = 0.125 mg/l and of fusidic acid 1.0-4.0 mg/l. All the SA showed MIC of mupirocin < or = 0.5 mg/l and of bacitracin of > or = 2.0 mg/l, 91% with MIC > or = 16 mg/l. FusR was shown by 32.5% of the SA strains with similar prevalence rates in 3 different geographical areas of Norway. One particular PFGE pattern (type 1) was shown by 76% of the FusR SA. SA of type 1 belonged to phage group II and produced exfoliative toxins. Thus, the results demonstrated a high prevalence of FusR among SA causing skin infections and that this was mainly due to dissemination of clonally related FusR SA.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Staphylococcus aureus (SA) isolates (n = 255) from outpatients with skin and soft-tissue infections were collected in 3 different areas in Norway. Group A streptococci (GAS, n = 68) were isolated from skin or pharyngotonsillar specimens from outpatients. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of bacitracin, fusidic acid and mupirocin were tested using the E-test. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns of fusidic acid-sensitive (FusS) and -resistant (FusR) SA were compared. All GAS isolates showed MIC of bacitracin of < or = 1.0 mg/l, of mupirocin of < or = 0.125 mg/l and of fusidic acid 1.0-4.0 mg/l. All the SA showed MIC of mupirocin < or = 0.5 mg/l and of bacitracin of > or = 2.0 mg/l, 91% with MIC > or = 16 mg/l. FusR was shown by 32.5% of the SA strains with similar prevalence rates in 3 different geographical areas of Norway. One particular PFGE pattern (type 1) was shown by 76% of the FusR SA. SA of type 1 belonged to phage group II and produced exfoliative toxins. Thus, the results demonstrated a high prevalence of FusR among SA causing skin infections and that this was mainly due to dissemination of clonally related FusR SA.

Key concepts: Fusidic acid, Bacitracin, Mupirocin, Microbiology, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Antibiotics, Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Susceptibility of Skin and Soft-tissue Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes to Topical Antibiotics: Indications of Clonal Spread of Fusidic Acid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus — Research Paper | ScholarLens