1981Poultry ScienceOpen access

The Effect of Limited-Area Brooding on Broiler Chicken Performance

F.N. REECE, B.D. LOTT, Johan Drott

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

Four limited-area brooding systems were compared to full-house brooding to determine the effect on growth rate, feed conversion, and mortality. The limited-area brooding systems evaluated were: 1) half-house, 2) third-house, 3) quarter-house for initial brooding followed by half-house for second brooding stage, and 4) quarter-house with wire floor for initial brooding followed by half-house with litter for second stage. Floor space allocations in the limited areas were determined by multiplying the area allocation at market age by the ratio of the time in the limited area to the total growing time. There were no significant differences in growth rate or feed conversion at market age among the brooding systems evaluated. Mortalities for the conventional full-house system, and the quarter-house system with wire floor were significantly greater than for the third-house system and quarter-house system with litter.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Four limited-area brooding systems were compared to full-house brooding to determine the effect on growth rate, feed conversion, and mortality. The limited-area brooding systems evaluated were: 1) half-house, 2) third-house, 3) quarter-house for initial brooding followed by half-house for second brooding stage, and 4) quarter-house with wire floor for initial brooding followed by half-house with litter for second stage. Floor space allocations in the limited areas were determined by multiplying the area allocation at market age by the ratio of the time in the limited area to the total growing time. There were no significant differences in growth rate or feed conversion at market age among the brooding systems evaluated. Mortalities for the conventional full-house system, and the quarter-house system with wire floor were significantly greater than for the third-house system and quarter-house system with litter.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Four limited-area brooding systems were compared to full-house brooding to determine the effect on growth rate, feed conversion, and mortality. The limited-area brooding systems evaluated were: 1) half-house, 2) third-house, 3) quarter-house for initial brooding followed by half-house for second brooding stage, and 4) quarter-house with wire floor for initial brooding followed by half-house with litter for second stage. Floor space allocations in the limited areas were determined by multiplying the area allocation at market age by the ratio of the time in the limited area to the total growing time. There were no significant differences in growth rate or feed conversion at market age among the brooding systems evaluated. Mortalities for the conventional full-house system, and the quarter-house system with wire floor were significantly greater than for the third-house system and quarter-house system with litter.

Key concepts: Quarter (Canadian coin), Litter, Animal science, Broiler, Feed conversion ratio, Deep litter, Environmental science, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Effect of Limited-Area Brooding on Broiler Chicken Performance — Research Paper | ScholarLens