2005British Journal of Community NursingRequires access

Removing indwelling catheters: trial without catheter in the community

John A. Robinson

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Indwelling urinary catheters are inserted to drain the bladder for a variety of reasons, but are an intervention of last resort. Unless contraindicated, patients with an indwelling catheter should therefore have at least one trial without catheter to assess if they can pass urine without having a catheter in situ. The commonest method in undertaking trial without catheter is to remove a indwelling urethral catheter and monitor urinary output over a period of time. Another method is when the catheter is not removed in patients who have a suprapubic catheter. Instead the catheter is clamped, and urethral urine output monitored. This is followed by immediately measuring any residue of urine drained via the supra-pubic catheter. This article looks at undertaking a 'trial without catheter' using both methods and examines the arguments concerning when to remove catheters, midnight or early in the morning.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Indwelling urinary catheters are inserted to drain the bladder for a variety of reasons, but are an intervention of last resort. Unless contraindicated, patients with an indwelling catheter should therefore have at least one trial without catheter to assess if they can pass urine without having a catheter in situ. The commonest method in undertaking trial without catheter is to remove a indwelling urethral catheter and monitor urinary output over a period of time. Another method is when the catheter is not removed in patients who have a suprapubic catheter. Instead the catheter is clamped, and urethral urine output monitored. This is followed by immediately measuring any residue of urine drained via the supra-pubic catheter. This article looks at undertaking a 'trial without catheter' using both methods and examines the arguments concerning when to remove catheters, midnight or early in the morning.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Indwelling urinary catheters are inserted to drain the bladder for a variety of reasons, but are an intervention of last resort. Unless contraindicated, patients with an indwelling catheter should therefore have at least one trial without catheter to assess if they can pass urine without having a catheter in situ. The commonest method in undertaking trial without catheter is to remove a indwelling urethral catheter and monitor urinary output over a period of time. Another method is when the catheter is not removed in patients who have a suprapubic catheter. Instead the catheter is clamped, and urethral urine output monitored. This is followed by immediately measuring any residue of urine drained via the supra-pubic catheter. This article looks at undertaking a 'trial without catheter' using both methods and examines the arguments concerning when to remove catheters, midnight or early in the morning.

Key concepts: Medicine, Catheter, Indwelling catheter, Surgery, Urinary catheter, Urine, Randomized controlled trial, Urinary catheterization

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Removing indwelling catheters: trial without catheter in the community — Research Paper | ScholarLens