2009Perspectives on European Politics and SocietyRequires access

The European Union and the Contested Politics of ‘Ever Closer Union’: Approaches to Integration, State Interests and Treaty Reform since Maastricht

Jonathan Bradbury

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The 1992 Maastricht Treaty on European Union made major commitments to economic and monetary union as well as to political reform culminating in the objective of an ‘ever closer union’. Since Maastricht there have been a series of intergovernmental councils focused on building on these objectives. Discussions have led to the Amsterdam Treaty (1997), the Nice Treaty (2001), the failed constitutional treaty (2004), and the Lisbon Treaty (2007). The paper first clarifies the achievements that resulted in the 1992 Treaty on European Union; secondly, it explores the ‘community method’ approach, intrinsic to the reforms at Amsterdam and Nice; and, thirdly, it examines the attempt at a more ‘constitutional’ approach to completing European Union during the 2000s, and the problems that this has faced. The paper argues that whilst integration strategies to achieve ‘ever closer union’ have been shaped by the need to respond to perceived collective ‘European’ challenges, developments in practice have been influenced by the assertion of different ‘nation’ state interests and contested visions of what ‘ever closer union’ should comprise. This respect for the diversity of state interests may be seen as a strength as European integration both deepens and widens, particularly in taking in Central East European states. On the other hand, the inability of the EU to offer a clear model of political development may yet squander the opportunity not only for the EU to achieve a coherent and consensual ‘ever closer union’ but also to show leadership and play a unifying role across the continent.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The 1992 Maastricht Treaty on European Union made major commitments to economic and monetary union as well as to political reform culminating in the objective of an ‘ever closer union’. Since Maastricht there have been a series of intergovernmental councils focused on building on these objectives. Discussions have led to the Amsterdam Treaty (1997), the Nice Treaty (2001), the failed constitutional treaty (2004), and the Lisbon Treaty (2007). The paper first clarifies the achievements that resulted in the 1992 Treaty on European Union; secondly, it explores the ‘community method’ approach, intrinsic to the reforms at Amsterdam and Nice; and, thirdly, it examines the attempt at a more ‘constitutional’ approach to completing European Union during the 2000s, and the problems that this has faced. The paper argues that whilst integration strategies to achieve ‘ever closer union’ have been shaped by the need to respond to perceived collective ‘European’ challenges, developments in practice have been influenced by the assertion of different ‘nation’ state interests and contested visions of what ‘ever closer union’ should comprise. This respect for the diversity of state interests may be seen as a strength as European integration both deepens and widens, particularly in taking in Central East European states. On the other hand, the inability of the EU to offer a clear model of political development may yet squander the opportunity not only for the EU to achieve a coherent and consensual ‘ever closer union’ but also to show leadership and play a unifying role across the continent.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The 1992 Maastricht Treaty on European Union made major commitments to economic and monetary union as well as to political reform culminating in the objective of an ‘ever closer union’. Since Maastricht there have been a series of intergovernmental councils focused on building on these objectives. Discussions have led to the Amsterdam Treaty (1997), the Nice Treaty (2001), the failed constitutional treaty (2004), and the Lisbon Treaty (2007). The paper first clarifies the achievements that resulted in the 1992 Treaty on European Union; secondly, it explores the ‘community method’ approach, intrinsic to the reforms at Amsterdam and Nice; and, thirdly, it examines the attempt at a more ‘constitutional’ approach to completing European Union during the 2000s, and the problems that this has faced. The paper argues that whilst integration strategies to achieve ‘ever closer union’ have been shaped by the need to respond to perceived collective ‘European’ challenges, developments in practice have been influenced by the assertion of different ‘nation’ state interests and contested visions of what ‘ever closer union’ should comprise. This respect for the diversity of state interests may be seen as a strength as European integration both deepens and widens, particularly in taking in Central East European states. On the other hand, the inability of the EU to offer a clear model of political development may yet squander the opportunity not only for the EU to achieve a coherent and consensual ‘ever closer union’ but also to show leadership and play a unifying role across the continent.

Key concepts: Maastricht Treaty, Treaty, European union, European integration, Politics, Political science, Political economy, State (computer science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The European Union and the Contested Politics of ‘Ever Closer Union’: Approaches to Integration, State Interests and Treaty Reform since Maastricht — Research Paper | ScholarLens