1988Latin American PerspectivesRequires access

State, Class, and Transition in Nicaragua

David F. Ruccio

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

The centrality of class in analyzing social change is one of the fundamental propositions of Marxian theory. Unfortunately, the revolutionary insights that can be gained from placing class at the center of analysis are often lost, particularly in transitional experiences. The problems of socialist development in Latin America and the Caribbean are rarely, if ever, viewed through the perspective of class. This is especially true when it comes to so-called economic questions. Key issues of the peripheral socialist economy, such as the state, accumulation, and macroeconomic stabilization, are discussed as if they were general economic problems, without contradictory class conditions and effects. The danger, of course, is that the socialist project of class transformation may be curtailed or even undermined by not taking these class aspects into account. Is there no alternative? One step in the direction of elaborating a specifically Marxian analysis of socialist development is to investigate the relationship between the state (including state economic policy) and class in the Nicaraguan Revolution. This analysis points out some of the typical tensions and contradictions involved in carrying out a socialist project in the context of a small mixed economy faced with external aggression.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The centrality of class in analyzing social change is one of the fundamental propositions of Marxian theory. Unfortunately, the revolutionary insights that can be gained from placing class at the center of analysis are often lost, particularly in transitional experiences. The problems of socialist development in Latin America and the Caribbean are rarely, if ever, viewed through the perspective of class. This is especially true when it comes to so-called economic questions. Key issues of the peripheral socialist economy, such as the state, accumulation, and macroeconomic stabilization, are discussed as if they were general economic problems, without contradictory class conditions and effects. The danger, of course, is that the socialist project of class transformation may be curtailed or even undermined by not taking these class aspects into account. Is there no alternative? One step in the direction of elaborating a specifically Marxian analysis of socialist development is to investigate the relationship between the state (including state economic policy) and class in the Nicaraguan Revolution. This analysis points out some of the typical tensions and contradictions involved in carrying out a socialist project in the context of a small mixed economy faced with external aggression.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The centrality of class in analyzing social change is one of the fundamental propositions of Marxian theory. Unfortunately, the revolutionary insights that can be gained from placing class at the center of analysis are often lost, particularly in transitional experiences. The problems of socialist development in Latin America and the Caribbean are rarely, if ever, viewed through the perspective of class. This is especially true when it comes to so-called economic questions. Key issues of the peripheral socialist economy, such as the state, accumulation, and macroeconomic stabilization, are discussed as if they were general economic problems, without contradictory class conditions and effects. The danger, of course, is that the socialist project of class transformation may be curtailed or even undermined by not taking these class aspects into account. Is there no alternative? One step in the direction of elaborating a specifically Marxian analysis of socialist development is to investigate the relationship between the state (including state economic policy) and class in the Nicaraguan Revolution. This analysis points out some of the typical tensions and contradictions involved in carrying out a socialist project in the context of a small mixed economy faced with external aggression.

Key concepts: Class analysis, Class conflict, Class (philosophy), State (computer science), Economic system, Context (archaeology), Capitalist state, Political economy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
State, Class, and Transition in Nicaragua — Research Paper | ScholarLens