1997Canadian Journal of BotanyRequires access

Ultrastructural markers and systematics in smut fungi and allied taxa

Robert Bauer, Franz Oberwinkler, Kálmán Vánky

Open publisher page 219 citations

Abstract

To identify monophyletic groups within the smut fungi and related taxa, characteristics of hyphal septation and zones of host–parasite interaction were analyzed by serial-section electron microscopy of 139 species belonging to 50 smut and 10 allied genera. Our results support the hypothesis of the existence of two phylogenetically separate lines of smut fungi. The first line, the Microbotryales, is composed of Aurantiosporium, Fulvisporium, Liroa, Microbotryum, Sphacelotheca, and Ustilentyloma, which are distributed into the Ustilentylomataceae and Microbotryaceae. The second monophyletic line, the Ustilaginomycetes, is formed by the remaining smut fungi studied here together with the Exobasidiales, Graphiolales, and Cryptobasidiales (in the traditional sense). The ultrastructural analysis identifies three lineages within the Ustilaginomycetes. The Entorrhizomycetidae are represented by Entorrhiza. The Ustilaginomycetidae consist of the Urocystales and Ustilaginales. The Exobasidiomycetidae are composed of the Doassansiales, Entylomatales, Exobasidiales, Georgefischeriales, Graphiolales, Microstromatales, and Tilletiales. The Entorrhizomycetidae, Exobasidianae, Entorrhizales, Entylomatales, Doassansiales, Georgefischeriales, Microbotryales, Microstromatales, Tilletiales, Urocystales, Entorrhizaceae, Entylomataceae, Georgefischeriaceae, Mycosyringaceae, Rhamphosporaceae, and Ustilentylomataceae are proposed as new taxa. The descriptions of the Exobasidiomycetidae, Ustilaginomycetidae, Exobasidiales, Ustilaginales, Doassansiaceae, Tilletiaceae, and Ustilaginaceae are emended. Some species of Ustilago are transferred to Microbotryum. Key words: basidiomycetes, classification, Exobasidiales, Graphiolales, phylogeny, smut fungi, ultrastructure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To identify monophyletic groups within the smut fungi and related taxa, characteristics of hyphal septation and zones of host–parasite interaction were analyzed by serial-section electron microscopy of 139 species belonging to 50 smut and 10 allied genera. Our results support the hypothesis of the existence of two phylogenetically separate lines of smut fungi. The first line, the Microbotryales, is composed of Aurantiosporium, Fulvisporium, Liroa, Microbotryum, Sphacelotheca, and Ustilentyloma, which are distributed into the Ustilentylomataceae and Microbotryaceae. The second monophyletic line, the Ustilaginomycetes, is formed by the remaining smut fungi studied here together with the Exobasidiales, Graphiolales, and Cryptobasidiales (in the traditional sense). The ultrastructural analysis identifies three lineages within the Ustilaginomycetes. The Entorrhizomycetidae are represented by Entorrhiza. The Ustilaginomycetidae consist of the Urocystales and Ustilaginales. The Exobasidiomycetidae are composed of the Doassansiales, Entylomatales, Exobasidiales, Georgefischeriales, Graphiolales, Microstromatales, and Tilletiales. The Entorrhizomycetidae, Exobasidianae, Entorrhizales, Entylomatales, Doassansiales, Georgefischeriales, Microbotryales, Microstromatales, Tilletiales, Urocystales, Entorrhizaceae, Entylomataceae, Georgefischeriaceae, Mycosyringaceae, Rhamphosporaceae, and Ustilentylomataceae are proposed as new taxa. The descriptions of the Exobasidiomycetidae, Ustilaginomycetidae, Exobasidiales, Ustilaginales, Doassansiaceae, Tilletiaceae, and Ustilaginaceae are emended. Some species of Ustilago are transferred to Microbotryum. Key words: basidiomycetes, classification, Exobasidiales, Graphiolales, phylogeny, smut fungi, ultrastructure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 219 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To identify monophyletic groups within the smut fungi and related taxa, characteristics of hyphal septation and zones of host–parasite interaction were analyzed by serial-section electron microscopy of 139 species belonging to 50 smut and 10 allied genera. Our results support the hypothesis of the existence of two phylogenetically separate lines of smut fungi. The first line, the Microbotryales, is composed of Aurantiosporium, Fulvisporium, Liroa, Microbotryum, Sphacelotheca, and Ustilentyloma, which are distributed into the Ustilentylomataceae and Microbotryaceae. The second monophyletic line, the Ustilaginomycetes, is formed by the remaining smut fungi studied here together with the Exobasidiales, Graphiolales, and Cryptobasidiales (in the traditional sense). The ultrastructural analysis identifies three lineages within the Ustilaginomycetes. The Entorrhizomycetidae are represented by Entorrhiza. The Ustilaginomycetidae consist of the Urocystales and Ustilaginales. The Exobasidiomycetidae are composed of the Doassansiales, Entylomatales, Exobasidiales, Georgefischeriales, Graphiolales, Microstromatales, and Tilletiales. The Entorrhizomycetidae, Exobasidianae, Entorrhizales, Entylomatales, Doassansiales, Georgefischeriales, Microbotryales, Microstromatales, Tilletiales, Urocystales, Entorrhizaceae, Entylomataceae, Georgefischeriaceae, Mycosyringaceae, Rhamphosporaceae, and Ustilentylomataceae are proposed as new taxa. The descriptions of the Exobasidiomycetidae, Ustilaginomycetidae, Exobasidiales, Ustilaginales, Doassansiaceae, Tilletiaceae, and Ustilaginaceae are emended. Some species of Ustilago are transferred to Microbotryum. Key words: basidiomycetes, classification, Exobasidiales, Graphiolales, phylogeny, smut fungi, ultrastructure.

Key concepts: Biology, Monophyly, Smut, Botany, Ultrastructure, Taxon, Systematics, Hypha

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ultrastructural markers and systematics in smut fungi and allied taxa — Research Paper | ScholarLens