2004•Young Consumers Insight and Ideas for Responsible MarketersRequires access

The great gender divide ‐ does it really exist?

Rachel Carey, Neil Samson

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Looks at the attitudes of children, parents and marketers to gender‐specific products, and relates this to the efforts of the political correctness lobby to render them obsolete. Finds that marketers have tended to respond to adults rather than the children themselves, and that the 1980s and 1990s were a period when it was thought that gender equality required that young children be treated as though there was no difference between the preferences of boys and girls. Argues instead that gender differences are an important identifying factor for children and that young boys and girls do prefer toys that reflect gender, for instance dolls for girls and guns for boys. Concludes that there are considerable opportunities for marketers and product developers to exploit the demand for gender‐specific products for children under eight.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Looks at the attitudes of children, parents and marketers to gender‐specific products, and relates this to the efforts of the political correctness lobby to render them obsolete. Finds that marketers have tended to respond to adults rather than the children themselves, and that the 1980s and 1990s were a period when it was thought that gender equality required that young children be treated as though there was no difference between the preferences of boys and girls. Argues instead that gender differences are an important identifying factor for children and that young boys and girls do prefer toys that reflect gender, for instance dolls for girls and guns for boys. Concludes that there are considerable opportunities for marketers and product developers to exploit the demand for gender‐specific products for children under eight.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Looks at the attitudes of children, parents and marketers to gender‐specific products, and relates this to the efforts of the political correctness lobby to render them obsolete. Finds that marketers have tended to respond to adults rather than the children themselves, and that the 1980s and 1990s were a period when it was thought that gender equality required that young children be treated as though there was no difference between the preferences of boys and girls. Argues instead that gender differences are an important identifying factor for children and that young boys and girls do prefer toys that reflect gender, for instance dolls for girls and guns for boys. Concludes that there are considerable opportunities for marketers and product developers to exploit the demand for gender‐specific products for children under eight.

Key concepts: Exploit, Product (mathematics), Political correctness, Politics, Psychology, Period (music), Gender gap, Advertising

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The great gender divide ‐ does it really exist? — Research Paper | ScholarLens