1991Clinical Infectious DiseasesRequires access

Serologic Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis: Analysis of 214 Cases by Agglutination Tests and Review of the Literature

Edward J. Young

Open publisher page 256 citations

Abstract

The serum agglutination test (SAT) and 2-mercaptoethanol (2ME) agglutination were used in studies of the sera of 214 patients in whom brucellosis was suspected. On the basis of historical, epidemiologic, clinical, and serologic data, four groups were identified: group I (108 cases) had negative agglutination reactions, and brucellosis was considered unlikely; group II (57 cases) had positive agglutination reactions, and active brucellosis was diagnosed; group III (37 cases) had positive agglutination reactions, but other factors--notably, a history of prior infection--made inactive brucellosis likely; and group IV (12 cases) had positive agglutination reactions, but insufficient data were available for further classification. Most patients with active brucellosis had agglutinin titers of greater than or equal to 160; however, no single titer was always diagnostic. Although more sensitive tests are available, agglutination reactions provide data sufficient to differentiate active from inactive disease when other factors are considered and follow-up sera are tested. This article discusses individual cases and reviews the literature on the diagnosis of brucellosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The serum agglutination test (SAT) and 2-mercaptoethanol (2ME) agglutination were used in studies of the sera of 214 patients in whom brucellosis was suspected. On the basis of historical, epidemiologic, clinical, and serologic data, four groups were identified: group I (108 cases) had negative agglutination reactions, and brucellosis was considered unlikely; group II (57 cases) had positive agglutination reactions, and active brucellosis was diagnosed; group III (37 cases) had positive agglutination reactions, but other factors--notably, a history of prior infection--made inactive brucellosis likely; and group IV (12 cases) had positive agglutination reactions, but insufficient data were available for further classification. Most patients with active brucellosis had agglutinin titers of greater than or equal to 160; however, no single titer was always diagnostic. Although more sensitive tests are available, agglutination reactions provide data sufficient to differentiate active from inactive disease when other factors are considered and follow-up sera are tested. This article discusses individual cases and reviews the literature on the diagnosis of brucellosis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 256 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The serum agglutination test (SAT) and 2-mercaptoethanol (2ME) agglutination were used in studies of the sera of 214 patients in whom brucellosis was suspected. On the basis of historical, epidemiologic, clinical, and serologic data, four groups were identified: group I (108 cases) had negative agglutination reactions, and brucellosis was considered unlikely; group II (57 cases) had positive agglutination reactions, and active brucellosis was diagnosed; group III (37 cases) had positive agglutination reactions, but other factors--notably, a history of prior infection--made inactive brucellosis likely; and group IV (12 cases) had positive agglutination reactions, but insufficient data were available for further classification. Most patients with active brucellosis had agglutinin titers of greater than or equal to 160; however, no single titer was always diagnostic. Although more sensitive tests are available, agglutination reactions provide data sufficient to differentiate active from inactive disease when other factors are considered and follow-up sera are tested. This article discusses individual cases and reviews the literature on the diagnosis of brucellosis.

Key concepts: Brucellosis, Medicine, Agglutination (biology), Direct agglutination test, Serology, Titer, Brucella, Immunology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Serologic Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis: Analysis of 214 Cases by Agglutination Tests and Review of the Literature — Research Paper | ScholarLens