Functional relations in the English auxiliary system
Yehuda N. Falk
Abstract
Yehuda N. Falk
Abstract
This article addresses the question of the syntactic functional relations between English auxiliaries and the verbal elements that follow them. There are two basic types of analysis: either the auxiliary is the head and the VP is the complement, or the “main verb” is the head and the auxiliary is a feature-bearing modifier. It is argued here that there is no single correct analysis for all English auxiliaries: some ( do, have, will/shall, would ) are feature-bearers while others are argument-taking predicates.
OpenAlex reports 65 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article addresses the question of the syntactic functional relations between English auxiliaries and the verbal elements that follow them. There are two basic types of analysis: either the auxiliary is the head and the VP is the complement, or the “main verb” is the head and the auxiliary is a feature-bearing modifier. It is argued here that there is no single correct analysis for all English auxiliaries: some ( do, have, will/shall, would ) are feature-bearers while others are argument-taking predicates.
Key concepts: Linguistics, Head (geology), Complement (music), Feature (linguistics), Argument (complex analysis), Verb, Computer science, Adjunct