2008•LinguisticsRequires access

Functional relations in the English auxiliary system

Yehuda N. Falk

Open publisher page 65 citations

Abstract

This article addresses the question of the syntactic functional relations between English auxiliaries and the verbal elements that follow them. There are two basic types of analysis: either the auxiliary is the head and the VP is the complement, or the “main verb” is the head and the auxiliary is a feature-bearing modifier. It is argued here that there is no single correct analysis for all English auxiliaries: some ( do, have, will/shall, would ) are feature-bearers while others are argument-taking predicates.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article addresses the question of the syntactic functional relations between English auxiliaries and the verbal elements that follow them. There are two basic types of analysis: either the auxiliary is the head and the VP is the complement, or the “main verb” is the head and the auxiliary is a feature-bearing modifier. It is argued here that there is no single correct analysis for all English auxiliaries: some ( do, have, will/shall, would ) are feature-bearers while others are argument-taking predicates.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 65 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article addresses the question of the syntactic functional relations between English auxiliaries and the verbal elements that follow them. There are two basic types of analysis: either the auxiliary is the head and the VP is the complement, or the “main verb” is the head and the auxiliary is a feature-bearing modifier. It is argued here that there is no single correct analysis for all English auxiliaries: some ( do, have, will/shall, would ) are feature-bearers while others are argument-taking predicates.

Key concepts: Linguistics, Head (geology), Complement (music), Feature (linguistics), Argument (complex analysis), Verb, Computer science, Adjunct

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Functional relations in the English auxiliary system — Research Paper | ScholarLens