1995•Journal of Food LipidsRequires access

PHENOL COMPOUNDS IDENTIFIED IN SELECTED LIQUID SMOKES

SUEANN K. SCHWANKE, WILLIAM G. IKINS, Mary Susan Brewer

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Liquid smokes including mesquite, hardwood blend, hickory (aqueous), and hickory‐oil (oil‐based) were subjected to direct ether extraction; phenolic components were separated and identified using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). A solution containing 1,250 μg/ml each of phenol, isoeugenol, o‐cresol, m‐cresol, 4‐allylsyringol, catechol, 4‐methylcatechol, 2,6‐dimethoxy‐phenol, 2‐methoxyphenol, 4‐ethylphenol, and 2,3‐dimethylphenol was injected directly or ether extracted prior to GC/MS separation for quantification of phenols in smokes and for recovery calculations. Phenol, guaiacol, syringol, and catechol in ether and ether extracted from oil were used as standards for oil‐based smoke. The total amount of phenols in the smokes was similar but the proportions of individual phenols differed. Hickory smoke contained more syringol and its derivatives (4‐allysyringol and 4‐methylsyringol) than mesquite; mesquite contained more phenol, o‐cresol, catechol and 4‐methylcatechol than hickory.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT Liquid smokes including mesquite, hardwood blend, hickory (aqueous), and hickory‐oil (oil‐based) were subjected to direct ether extraction; phenolic components were separated and identified using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). A solution containing 1,250 μg/ml each of phenol, isoeugenol, o‐cresol, m‐cresol, 4‐allylsyringol, catechol, 4‐methylcatechol, 2,6‐dimethoxy‐phenol, 2‐methoxyphenol, 4‐ethylphenol, and 2,3‐dimethylphenol was injected directly or ether extracted prior to GC/MS separation for quantification of phenols in smokes and for recovery calculations. Phenol, guaiacol, syringol, and catechol in ether and ether extracted from oil were used as standards for oil‐based smoke. The total amount of phenols in the smokes was similar but the proportions of individual phenols differed. Hickory smoke contained more syringol and its derivatives (4‐allysyringol and 4‐methylsyringol) than mesquite; mesquite contained more phenol, o‐cresol, catechol and 4‐methylcatechol than hickory.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT Liquid smokes including mesquite, hardwood blend, hickory (aqueous), and hickory‐oil (oil‐based) were subjected to direct ether extraction; phenolic components were separated and identified using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). A solution containing 1,250 μg/ml each of phenol, isoeugenol, o‐cresol, m‐cresol, 4‐allylsyringol, catechol, 4‐methylcatechol, 2,6‐dimethoxy‐phenol, 2‐methoxyphenol, 4‐ethylphenol, and 2,3‐dimethylphenol was injected directly or ether extracted prior to GC/MS separation for quantification of phenols in smokes and for recovery calculations. Phenol, guaiacol, syringol, and catechol in ether and ether extracted from oil were used as standards for oil‐based smoke. The total amount of phenols in the smokes was similar but the proportions of individual phenols differed. Hickory smoke contained more syringol and its derivatives (4‐allysyringol and 4‐methylsyringol) than mesquite; mesquite contained more phenol, o‐cresol, catechol and 4‐methylcatechol than hickory.

Key concepts: Guaiacol, Chemistry, Catechol, Phenols, Phenol, Isoeugenol, Ether, Chromatography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PHENOL COMPOUNDS IDENTIFIED IN SELECTED LIQUID SMOKES — Research Paper | ScholarLens