2000The Pediatric Infectious Disease JournalRequires access

Viral strain identification in varicella vaccinees with disseminated rashes

Philip S. LaRussa, Sharon P. Steinberg, Eugene D. Shapiro, Marietta Vázquez, Anne A. Gershon

Open publisher page 49 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 15% of recipients of live attenuated varicella vaccine may develop mild breakthrough varicella months to years after immunization. Although some vaccinees will develop zoster, it is less common in recipients of vaccine than in those who have had natural varicella. OBJECTIVE: To determine the varicella-zoster virus (VZV) strain responsible for breakthrough varicella and zoster in recipients of varicella vaccine. METHODS: A PCR assay capable of distinguishing wild-type from vaccine strain VZV was performed on samples from skin lesions from vaccinees with breakthrough varicella and zoster. RESULTS: All of 57 vaccinees with breakthrough varicella, clinically diagnosed on the basis of a generalized maculopapular or vesicular rash, in which there was amplifiable DNA [corrected], had wild-type VZV infection based on analysis of viral DNA. The Oka vaccine strain of VZV was not identified in any of these cases. In contrast, in 32 patients with zosteriform rashes, the vaccine strain was identified in 22 samples, and the wild-type strain was identified in 10 samples. CONCLUSIONS: Wild-type virus was identified in all generalized rashes occurring after the immediate 6-week postvaccination period. When reactivation of vaccine strain occurred, it presented as typical zoster. We find no evidence that reactivation of vaccine virus occurs with the clinical picture of generalized rash.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Approximately 15% of recipients of live attenuated varicella vaccine may develop mild breakthrough varicella months to years after immunization. Although some vaccinees will develop zoster, it is less common in recipients of vaccine than in those who have had natural varicella. OBJECTIVE: To determine the varicella-zoster virus (VZV) strain responsible for breakthrough varicella and zoster in recipients of varicella vaccine. METHODS: A PCR assay capable of distinguishing wild-type from vaccine strain VZV was performed on samples from skin lesions from vaccinees with breakthrough varicella and zoster. RESULTS: All of 57 vaccinees with breakthrough varicella, clinically diagnosed on the basis of a generalized maculopapular or vesicular rash, in which there was amplifiable DNA [corrected], had wild-type VZV infection based on analysis of viral DNA. The Oka vaccine strain of VZV was not identified in any of these cases. In contrast, in 32 patients with zosteriform rashes, the vaccine strain was identified in 22 samples, and the wild-type strain was identified in 10 samples. CONCLUSIONS: Wild-type virus was identified in all generalized rashes occurring after the immediate 6-week postvaccination period. When reactivation of vaccine strain occurred, it presented as typical zoster. We find no evidence that reactivation of vaccine virus occurs with the clinical picture of generalized rash.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 49 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 15% of recipients of live attenuated varicella vaccine may develop mild breakthrough varicella months to years after immunization. Although some vaccinees will develop zoster, it is less common in recipients of vaccine than in those who have had natural varicella. OBJECTIVE: To determine the varicella-zoster virus (VZV) strain responsible for breakthrough varicella and zoster in recipients of varicella vaccine. METHODS: A PCR assay capable of distinguishing wild-type from vaccine strain VZV was performed on samples from skin lesions from vaccinees with breakthrough varicella and zoster. RESULTS: All of 57 vaccinees with breakthrough varicella, clinically diagnosed on the basis of a generalized maculopapular or vesicular rash, in which there was amplifiable DNA [corrected], had wild-type VZV infection based on analysis of viral DNA. The Oka vaccine strain of VZV was not identified in any of these cases. In contrast, in 32 patients with zosteriform rashes, the vaccine strain was identified in 22 samples, and the wild-type strain was identified in 10 samples. CONCLUSIONS: Wild-type virus was identified in all generalized rashes occurring after the immediate 6-week postvaccination period. When reactivation of vaccine strain occurred, it presented as typical zoster. We find no evidence that reactivation of vaccine virus occurs with the clinical picture of generalized rash.

Key concepts: Varicella vaccine, Virology, Medicine, Varicella zoster virus, Virus, Chickenpox Vaccine, Rash, Maculopapular rash

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Viral strain identification in varicella vaccinees with disseminated rashes — Research Paper | ScholarLens