2009Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaRequires access

Comparison of Magnitude Estimates for New Zealand Earthquakes: Moment Magnitude, Local Magnitude, and Teleseismic Body-Wave Magnitude

John Ristau

Open publisher page 114 citations

Abstract

New Zealand is one of the more seismically active countries in the world, with more than 15,000 earthquakes located each year. Routine moment tensor analysis of regional seismic data for earthquakes with moment magnitude M w>∼3.5–4.0 has recently been implemented in New Zealand. Nearly 330 regional moment tensor (RMT) solutions have been calculated for earthquakes in the New Zealand region dating back to late 2003. This complements local magnitude ( M L), the primary magnitude calculated by GeoNet in New Zealand. The RMT catalog, along with 155 Global Centroid Moment Tensor (Global CMT) catalog solutions, is used to compare M w with M L for New Zealand earthquakes. In addition to M w and M L, there are more than 330 teleseismic body-wave magnitude ( m b) values available from the United States Geological Survey and International Seismological Center catalogs for events that also have an M w. These are used to examine the relationship between M w, M L, and m b for New Zealand earthquakes. There is a clear distinction in the relationship of M L to M w for shallow focus (≤33 km depth) and deep focus (>33 km depth) earthquakes. Shallow focus earthquakes show M L to be fairly consistent with M w, particularly for events with M w>∼4.5 and with ![Graphic][1] . Deep focus earthquakes have M L consistently larger than M w (more than a full magnitude unit for some events) with ![Graphic][2] . M w and m b are in fairly good agreement regardless of the depth, whereas m b estimates are consistently smaller than M L for deep events. This suggests that M L is overestimated for deep focus events and that the large M Ls are not the result of physical properties of the source. [1]: /embed/inline-graphic-1.gif [2]: /embed/inline-graphic-2.gif

About this research paper

What this paper is about

New Zealand is one of the more seismically active countries in the world, with more than 15,000 earthquakes located each year. Routine moment tensor analysis of regional seismic data for earthquakes with moment magnitude M w>∼3.5–4.0 has recently been implemented in New Zealand. Nearly 330 regional moment tensor (RMT) solutions have been calculated for earthquakes in the New Zealand region dating back to late 2003. This complements local magnitude ( M L), the primary magnitude calculated by GeoNet in New Zealand. The RMT catalog, along with 155 Global Centroid Moment Tensor (Global CMT) catalog solutions, is used to compare M w with M L for New Zealand earthquakes. In addition to M w and M L, there are more than 330 teleseismic body-wave magnitude ( m b) values available from the United States Geological Survey and International Seismological Center catalogs for events that also have an M w. These are used to examine the relationship between M w, M L, and m b for New Zealand earthquakes. There is a clear distinction in the relationship of M L to M w for shallow focus (≤33 km depth) and deep focus (>33 km depth) earthquakes. Shallow focus earthquakes show M L to be fairly consistent with M w, particularly for events with M w>∼4.5 and with ![Graphic][1] . Deep focus earthquakes have M L consistently larger than M w (more than a full magnitude unit for some events) with ![Graphic][2] . M w and m b are in fairly good agreement regardless of the depth, whereas m b estimates are consistently smaller than M L for deep events. This suggests that M L is overestimated for deep focus events and that the large M Ls are not the result of physical properties of the source. [1]: /embed/inline-graphic-1.gif [2]: /embed/inline-graphic-2.gif

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 114 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

New Zealand is one of the more seismically active countries in the world, with more than 15,000 earthquakes located each year. Routine moment tensor analysis of regional seismic data for earthquakes with moment magnitude M w>∼3.5–4.0 has recently been implemented in New Zealand. Nearly 330 regional moment tensor (RMT) solutions have been calculated for earthquakes in the New Zealand region dating back to late 2003. This complements local magnitude ( M L), the primary magnitude calculated by GeoNet in New Zealand. The RMT catalog, along with 155 Global Centroid Moment Tensor (Global CMT) catalog solutions, is used to compare M w with M L for New Zealand earthquakes. In addition to M w and M L, there are more than 330 teleseismic body-wave magnitude ( m b) values available from the United States Geological Survey and International Seismological Center catalogs for events that also have an M w. These are used to examine the relationship between M w, M L, and m b for New Zealand earthquakes. There is a clear distinction in the relationship of M L to M w for shallow focus (≤33 km depth) and deep focus (>33 km depth) earthquakes. Shallow focus earthquakes show M L to be fairly consistent with M w, particularly for events with M w>∼4.5 and with ![Graphic][1] . Deep focus earthquakes have M L consistently larger than M w (more than a full magnitude unit for some events) with ![Graphic][2] . M w and m b are in fairly good agreement regardless of the depth, whereas m b estimates are consistently smaller than M L for deep events. This suggests that M L is overestimated for deep focus events and that the large M Ls are not the result of physical properties of the source. [1]: /embed/inline-graphic-1.gif [2]: /embed/inline-graphic-2.gif

Key concepts: Magnitude (astronomy), Moment magnitude scale, Geology, Seismology, Richter magnitude scale, Earthquake magnitude, Maximum magnitude, Geodesy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Magnitude Estimates for New Zealand Earthquakes: Moment Magnitude, Local Magnitude, and Teleseismic Body-Wave Magnitude — Research Paper | ScholarLens