1993Behavioural PharmacologyRequires access

Strain-dependent behavioural sensitization to amphetamine

Simona Cabib

Open publisher page 40 citations

Abstract

Repeated daily pairings of 1mg/kg of amphetamine and test environment induced a large, significant increase of locomotion in mice of the C57BL/6 strain, while a slight, non-significant increase was observed in mice of the DBA/2 strain. Neither C57BL/6 nor DBA/2 mice showed behavioral sensitization to amphetamine in the test cages when the drug was repeatedly administered in their home cage. Moreover, C57BL/6 but not DBA/2 mice showed conditioned hyperactivity. Subsequently six daily pairings of saline and test cage produced a slight, non-significant reduction of the hyperactive response shown by C57BL/6 mice, accompanied by a further increase in the behavioural effect of amphetamine. Finally, a similar, significant context-independent sensitization (unpaired vs control) was observed in mice of the two strains subjected to pairings of saline with the test cage; while context-dependent sensitization (paired vs unpaired) was observed only in C57BL/6 mice. Naive DBA/2 were less susceptible than C57BL/6 mice to the behavioural effect of high doses of amphetamine. However, effects of the low dose of amphetamine used in this experiment did not show strain differences in naive mice. These results show that C57BL/6 are more susceptible than DBA/2 mice to context-dependent behavioural sensitization to amphetamine. Moreover, they suggest that neither conditioned hyperactivity nor context-independent sensitization account for strain differences in environment-specific behavioural sensitization.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Repeated daily pairings of 1mg/kg of amphetamine and test environment induced a large, significant increase of locomotion in mice of the C57BL/6 strain, while a slight, non-significant increase was observed in mice of the DBA/2 strain. Neither C57BL/6 nor DBA/2 mice showed behavioral sensitization to amphetamine in the test cages when the drug was repeatedly administered in their home cage. Moreover, C57BL/6 but not DBA/2 mice showed conditioned hyperactivity. Subsequently six daily pairings of saline and test cage produced a slight, non-significant reduction of the hyperactive response shown by C57BL/6 mice, accompanied by a further increase in the behavioural effect of amphetamine. Finally, a similar, significant context-independent sensitization (unpaired vs control) was observed in mice of the two strains subjected to pairings of saline with the test cage; while context-dependent sensitization (paired vs unpaired) was observed only in C57BL/6 mice. Naive DBA/2 were less susceptible than C57BL/6 mice to the behavioural effect of high doses of amphetamine. However, effects of the low dose of amphetamine used in this experiment did not show strain differences in naive mice. These results show that C57BL/6 are more susceptible than DBA/2 mice to context-dependent behavioural sensitization to amphetamine. Moreover, they suggest that neither conditioned hyperactivity nor context-independent sensitization account for strain differences in environment-specific behavioural sensitization.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Repeated daily pairings of 1mg/kg of amphetamine and test environment induced a large, significant increase of locomotion in mice of the C57BL/6 strain, while a slight, non-significant increase was observed in mice of the DBA/2 strain. Neither C57BL/6 nor DBA/2 mice showed behavioral sensitization to amphetamine in the test cages when the drug was repeatedly administered in their home cage. Moreover, C57BL/6 but not DBA/2 mice showed conditioned hyperactivity. Subsequently six daily pairings of saline and test cage produced a slight, non-significant reduction of the hyperactive response shown by C57BL/6 mice, accompanied by a further increase in the behavioural effect of amphetamine. Finally, a similar, significant context-independent sensitization (unpaired vs control) was observed in mice of the two strains subjected to pairings of saline with the test cage; while context-dependent sensitization (paired vs unpaired) was observed only in C57BL/6 mice. Naive DBA/2 were less susceptible than C57BL/6 mice to the behavioural effect of high doses of amphetamine. However, effects of the low dose of amphetamine used in this experiment did not show strain differences in naive mice. These results show that C57BL/6 are more susceptible than DBA/2 mice to context-dependent behavioural sensitization to amphetamine. Moreover, they suggest that neither conditioned hyperactivity nor context-independent sensitization account for strain differences in environment-specific behavioural sensitization.

Key concepts: Sensitization, Amphetamine, Context (archaeology), Behavioral sensitization, C57BL/6, Strain (injury), Saline, Cage

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Strain-dependent behavioural sensitization to amphetamine — Research Paper | ScholarLens